Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs Magistral Medium
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B comes out ahead, 65 to 30 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
NVIDIALlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B
65/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context128K
Mistral AIMagistral Medium
30/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $5.00
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is our pick
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Magistral Medium (30). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B Free · Magistral Medium $2.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B 128,000 · Magistral Medium 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B: Text · Magistral Medium: Text
- Self-hostingLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 29 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 30/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BNVIDIA | Magistral MediumMistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | Free (best) | $2.00 |
| Output | Free (best) | $5.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | Free (best) | $2.75 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Nvidia API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 16,384 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1 | magistral-medium-latest |
| API providers | 1 | 4 (best) |
| Released | Apr 7, 2025 | Mar 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jun 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BFree
- Magistral Medium$30.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B or Magistral Medium?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Magistral Medium (30). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B or Magistral Medium?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price). Magistral Medium costs $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B has not been scored yet and Magistral Medium has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and Magistral Medium yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and Magistral Medium share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B up to 8,192, Magistral Medium up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B accepts text; Magistral Medium accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Magistral Medium is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B is the newest, released Apr 7, 2025. Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-4.5-FlashThree-way comparison
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs GLM-4.5-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs Nova 2 ProAmazon
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs Laguna M.1Poolside
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs Aya Vision 32BCohere
- Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Magistral Medium vs Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity
