ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Seed 1.6 Vision

Seed 1.6 Vision comes out ahead, 63 to 45 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. NVIDIA

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

    Released Apr 15, 2025

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.478 / $0.504
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
  2. Our pick

    ByteDance Seed

    Seed 1.6 Vision

    Released Aug 15, 2025

    63/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.119 / $1.19
    • Context256K
    Full specs Remove Seed 1.6 Vision

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Seed 1.6 Vision is our pick

Seed 1.6 Vision is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (45). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSeed 1.6 VisionSeed 1.6 Vision $0.386 · Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct $0.485 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextSeed 1.6 VisionSeed 1.6 Vision 256,000 · Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 1.6 VisionLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct: Text · Seed 1.6 Vision: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructSeed 1.6 Vision
Price50%6569
Inputs & features30%2570
Context window20%2436
Overall100%45/10063/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Seed 1.6 Vision specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIASeed 1.6 VisionByteDance Seed
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.478$0.119 (best)
Output$0.504 (best)$1.19
Cached input—$0.024
Blended (3:1)$0.485$0.386 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 32K: $0.178 / $2.37
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial Volcengine Ark API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Max output8,192 tokens32,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDnvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-70b-instructdoubao-seed-1-6-vision-250815
API providers3 (best)2
ReleasedApr 15, 2025Aug 15, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct$5.79
  • Seed 1.6 Vision$3.56
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Seed 1.6 Vision?

Seed 1.6 Vision is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (45). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Seed 1.6 Vision?

Seed 1.6 Vision is cheaper at $0.119 input / $1.19 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct costs $0.478 input / $0.504 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers; free on Nvidia). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.386 per million tokens for Seed 1.6 Vision versus $0.485 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has not been scored yet and Seed 1.6 Vision has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Seed 1.6 Vision yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 1.6 Vision has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct. Maximum output per response: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct up to 8,192, Seed 1.6 Vision up to 32,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct accepts text; Seed 1.6 Vision accepts text and images. Seed 1.6 Vision handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 1.6 Vision is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 1.6 Vision is the newest, released Aug 15, 2025. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct came out Apr 15, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons