Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Claude Haiku 3 vs GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o mini comes out ahead, 56 to 47 and 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
MetaLlama-3.1-70B-Instruct
44/100- ECI125.9
- Price$0.72 / $0.72
- Context128K
AnthropicClaude Haiku 3
47/100- ECI118.4
- Price$0.25 / $1.25
- Context200K
- Our pick
OpenAIGPT-4o mini
56/100- ECI126.6
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
GPT-4o mini is our pick
GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Claude Haiku 3 (47) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44). It leads on price and inputs & features. Claude Haiku 3 wins on context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-4o miniCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 · Claude Haiku 3 118.4
- Lowest priceGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini $0.263 · Claude Haiku 3 $0.50 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct $0.72 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextClaude Haiku 3Claude Haiku 3 200,000 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 128,000 · GPT-4o mini 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 3 and GPT-4o miniLlama-3.1-70B-Instruct: Text · Claude Haiku 3: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingLlama-3.1-70B-InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct | Claude Haiku 3 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 48 | 38 | 49 |
| Price | 25% | 57 | 64 | 77 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 25 | 60 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 32 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 44/100 | 47/100 | 56/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Llama-3.1-70B-InstructMeta | Claude Haiku 3Anthropic | GPT-4o miniOpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 125.9 | 118.4 | 126.6 (best) |
| ECI rank | #136 of 148 | #143 of 148 | #135 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 44.2% (best) | 36.3% | 37.7% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | — | 0.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 3.6% | 1.8% | 6.9% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | — | 8.3% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.72 | $0.25 | $0.15 (best) |
| Output | $0.72 | $1.25 | $0.60 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.075 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.72 | $0.50 | $0.263 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 5 providers | Median of 2 providers | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 4,096 tokens | 16,384 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | gpt-4o-mini |
| API providers | 5 | 2 | 21 (best) |
| Released | Jul 23, 2024 | Mar 13, 2024 | Jul 18, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2023 | Aug 31, 2023 | Sep 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct$8.64
- Claude Haiku 3$5.00
- GPT-4o mini$2.70
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Claude Haiku 3 or GPT-4o mini?
GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Claude Haiku 3 (47) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44). It leads on price and inputs & features. Claude Haiku 3 wins on context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Claude Haiku 3 or GPT-4o mini?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Claude Haiku 3 costs $0.25 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for GPT-4o mini versus $0.50 for Claude Haiku 3 (1.9× as much) and $0.72 for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (2.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-4o mini scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148), Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 (#136 of 148) and Claude Haiku 3 118.4 (#143 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (120.5–128.5 vs 121.0–128.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 44.2%, GPT-4o mini 37.7%, Claude Haiku 3 36.3%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-4o mini 6.9%, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 3.6%, Claude Haiku 3 1.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Claude Haiku 3 and GPT-4o mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-4o mini leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 3 has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and 128,000 for GPT-4o mini. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct up to 4,096, Claude Haiku 3 up to 4,096, GPT-4o mini up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct accepts text; Claude Haiku 3 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs. Claude Haiku 3 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 3 and GPT-4o mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct is the newest, released Jul 23, 2024. GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024; Claude Haiku 3 came out Mar 13, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct Dec 2023, Claude Haiku 3 Aug 31, 2023, GPT-4o mini Sep 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 128.5
- Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Nova ProAmazon · ECI 123.8
- Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Claude Haiku 3.5Anthropic · ECI 127.2
- Claude Haiku 3 vs Mixtral 8x7BMistral AI · ECI 118.5
- Claude Haiku 3 vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
- Claude Haiku 3 vs Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta · ECI 116.6
