ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Laguna XS.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs North Mini Code

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning comes out ahead, 68 to 41 and 36 on our weighted score.

  1. Poolside

    Laguna XS.2

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    36/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context262K
  2. Our pick

    NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.85
    • Context256K
  3. Cohere

    North Mini Code

    Released Jun 9, 2026

    41/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context256K
01 — Verdict

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is our pick

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against North Mini Code (41) and Laguna XS.2 (36). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNorth Mini CodeNorth Mini Code Free · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning $0.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Laguna XS.2 unpriced
  • Longest contextLaguna XS.2Laguna XS.2 262,144 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 256,000 · North Mini Code 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningLaguna XS.2: Text · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video · North Mini Code: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLaguna XS.2Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNorth Mini Code
Inputs & features60%359045
Context window40%373636
Overall100%36/10068/10041/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Laguna XS.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs North Mini Code specifications side by side
SpecificationLaguna XS.2PoolsideNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIANorth Mini CodeCohere
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input—$0.25Free (best)
Output—$0.85Free (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)—$0.40Free (best)
Long-context rate—Same rateSame rate
Price source—Median of 4 providersOfficial Cohere API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)256,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYesYeshigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model ID—nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoningnorth-mini-code-1-0
API providers18 (best)2
ReleasedApr 28, 2026Apr 28, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Sep 23, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Laguna XS.2—
  • Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning$4.20
  • North Mini CodeFree
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Laguna XS.2, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or North Mini Code?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against North Mini Code (41) and Laguna XS.2 (36). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Laguna XS.2, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or North Mini Code?

North Mini Code is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.25 input / $0.85 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Nvidia). North Mini Code is listed as free. Laguna XS.2 has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Laguna XS.2 has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning has not been scored yet and North Mini Code has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna XS.2, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and North Mini Code yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna XS.2 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and 256,000 for North Mini Code. Maximum output per response: Laguna XS.2 up to 32,768, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning up to 65,536, North Mini Code up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Laguna XS.2 accepts text; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video; North Mini Code accepts text. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

North Mini Code is the newest, released Jun 9, 2026. Laguna XS.2 came out Apr 28, 2026; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning came out Apr 28, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: North Mini Code Sep 23, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.