Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Laguna XS 2.1 comes out ahead, 68 to 34 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
PoolsideLaguna XS 2.1
68/100- ECI—
- Price$0.06 / $0.12
- Context262K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
34/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Laguna XS 2.1 is our pick
Laguna XS 2.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34). It leads on price. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLaguna XS 2.1Laguna XS 2.1 $0.075 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameLaguna XS 2.1 262,144 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsLaguna XS 2.1: Text · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Laguna XS 2.1 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 34/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Laguna XS 2.1Poolside | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.06 (best) | $2.00 |
| Output | $0.12 (best) | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.075 (best) | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 21 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Openqwen3.8-max |
| API model ID | poolside/laguna-xs-2.1 | — |
| API providers | 4 | 21 (best) |
| Released | Jul 2, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Laguna XS 2.1$0.84
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Laguna XS 2.1 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Laguna XS 2.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34). It leads on price. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Laguna XS 2.1 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Laguna XS 2.1 is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.12 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider; free on Poolside). Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 21 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.075 per million tokens for Laguna XS 2.1 versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (40× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Laguna XS 2.1 has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Laguna XS 2.1 up to 32,768, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Laguna XS 2.1 accepts text; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (qwen3.8-max), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Laguna XS 2.1 came out Jul 2, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BThree-way comparison
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Gemma 4 E2B ITGoogle
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Mercury 2.5Inception
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAI
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs ParetoUnbiased
