Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith 1.0 397B
Ornith 1.0 397B comes out ahead, 51 to 36 on our weighted score.
PoolsideLaguna XS 2.1
36/100- ECI—
- Price$0.06 / $0.12
- Context262K
- Our pick
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.0 397B
51/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Ornith 1.0 397B is our pick
Ornith 1.0 397B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Laguna XS 2.1 (36). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLaguna XS 2.1Laguna XS 2.1 $0.075 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Ornith 1.0 397B unpriced
- Longest contextAbout the sameLaguna XS 2.1 262,144 · Ornith 1.0 397B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsOrnith 1.0 397BLaguna XS 2.1: Text · Ornith 1.0 397B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Laguna XS 2.1 | Ornith 1.0 397B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 35 | 60 |
| Context window | 40% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 36/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Laguna XS 2.1Poolside | Ornith 1.0 397BDeepReinforce |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.06 | — |
| Output | $0.12 | — |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.075 | — |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | — |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | — |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | poolside/laguna-xs-2.1 | — |
| API providers | 4 | — |
| Released | Jul 2, 2026 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Laguna XS 2.1$0.84
- Ornith 1.0 397B—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Laguna XS 2.1 or Ornith 1.0 397B?
Ornith 1.0 397B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against Laguna XS 2.1 (36). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Laguna XS 2.1 or Ornith 1.0 397B?
Laguna XS 2.1 is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.12 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider; free on Poolside). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.075 per million tokens for Laguna XS 2.1 versus . Ornith 1.0 397B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Laguna XS 2.1 has not been scored yet and Ornith 1.0 397B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna XS 2.1 and Ornith 1.0 397B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna XS 2.1 and Ornith 1.0 397B share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Laguna XS 2.1 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Laguna XS 2.1 accepts text; Ornith 1.0 397B accepts text and images. Ornith 1.0 397B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (MIT), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Laguna XS 2.1 is the newest, released Jul 2, 2026. Ornith 1.0 397B came out Jun 25, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BThree-way comparison
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Gemma 4 E2B ITGoogle
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Mercury 2.5Inception
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAI
- Ornith 1.0 397B vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- Ornith 1.0 397B vs LongCat-2.0Meituan (LongCat)
