Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Too close to call on our weighted score (Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 71, Qwen3.8 Flash Next 70, Laguna XS 2.1 68). The right pick depends on what you value most.
PoolsideLaguna XS 2.1
68/100- ECI—
- Price$0.06 / $0.12
- Context262K
NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
71/100- ECI—
- Price$0.05 / $0.20
- Context262K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Flash Next
70/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.50
- Context262K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 71/100, Qwen3.8 Flash Next 70/100, Laguna XS 2.1 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Laguna XS 2.1 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLaguna XS 2.1Laguna XS 2.1 $0.075 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B $0.087 · Qwen3.8 Flash Next $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameLaguna XS 2.1 262,144 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 262,144 · Qwen3.8 Flash Next 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 Flash NextLaguna XS 2.1: Text · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: Text · Qwen3.8 Flash Next: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Laguna XS 2.1 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | Qwen3.8 Flash Next |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 100 | 76 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 45 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 71/100 | 70/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Laguna XS 2.1Poolside | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA | Qwen3.8 Flash NextAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.06 | $0.05 (best) | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.12 (best) | $0.20 | $0.50 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.075 (best) | $0.087 | $0.275 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 9 providers | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Openqwen-community-1.0 |
| API model ID | poolside/laguna-xs-2.1 | nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b | — |
| API providers | 4 | 12 (best) | 5 |
| Released | Jul 2, 2026 | Aug 11, 2026 | Aug 27, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Laguna XS 2.1$0.84
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B$0.90
- Qwen3.8 Flash Next$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Laguna XS 2.1, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 71/100, Qwen3.8 Flash Next 70/100, Laguna XS 2.1 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Laguna XS 2.1 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Laguna XS 2.1, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Laguna XS 2.1 is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.12 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider; free on Poolside). Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B costs $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers; free on Nvidia); Qwen3.8 Flash Next costs $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.075 per million tokens for Laguna XS 2.1 versus $0.087 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B (1.2× as much) and $0.275 for Qwen3.8 Flash Next (3.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Laguna XS 2.1 has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 Flash Next has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna XS 2.1, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 Flash Next yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna XS 2.1, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 Flash Next share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Laguna XS 2.1 up to 32,768, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B up to 262,144, Qwen3.8 Flash Next up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Laguna XS 2.1 accepts text; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B accepts text; Qwen3.8 Flash Next accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.8 Flash Next handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (qwen-community-1.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is the newest, released Aug 27, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B came out Aug 11, 2026; Laguna XS 2.1 came out Jul 2, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
