ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Laguna S 2.1 comes out ahead, 69 to 65 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Poolside

    Laguna S 2.1

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.20
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Laguna S 2.1

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.7 Plus

    Released Jun 2, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI147.4
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.7 Plus

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Laguna S 2.1 is our pick

Laguna S 2.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Qwen3.7 Plus (65). It leads on price. Qwen3.7 Plus wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 $0.125 · Qwen3.7 Plus $0.70 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 1,048,576 · Qwen3.7 Plus 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.7 PlusLaguna S 2.1: Text · Qwen3.7 Plus: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingLaguna S 2.1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLaguna S 2.1Qwen3.7 Plus
Price50%9357
Inputs & features30%3580
Context window20%6160
Overall100%69/10065/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationLaguna S 2.1PoolsideQwen3.7 PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—147.4
ECI rank—#61 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—87.9%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—93.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10 (best)$0.40
Output$0.20 (best)$1.60
Cached input—$0.04
Blended (3:1)$0.125 (best)$0.70
Long-context rateSame rateOver 256K: $1.20 / $4.80
Price sourceMedian of 4 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens64,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDpoolside/laguna-s-2.1qwen3.7-plus
API providers625 (best)
ReleasedJul 21, 2026Jun 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Laguna S 2.1$1.40
  • Qwen3.7 Plus$7.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Laguna S 2.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Qwen3.7 Plus (65). It leads on price. Qwen3.7 Plus wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Poolside). Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Laguna S 2.1 versus $0.70 for Qwen3.7 Plus (5.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Laguna S 2.1 has not been scored yet and Qwen3.7 Plus has an ECI of 147.4.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna S 2.1 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Maximum output per response: Laguna S 2.1 up to 32,768, Qwen3.7 Plus up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Laguna S 2.1 accepts text; Qwen3.7 Plus accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.7 Plus handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Laguna S 2.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.7 Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Laguna S 2.1 is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. Qwen3.7 Plus came out Jun 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3.7 Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons