Laguna S 2.1 vs GPT-5.4 nano
Laguna S 2.1 comes out ahead, 69 to 63 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
PoolsideLaguna S 2.1
69/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.20
- Context1.05M
OpenAIGPT-5.4 nano
63/100- ECI145.8
- Price$0.20 / $1.25
- Context400K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Laguna S 2.1 is our pick
Laguna S 2.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against GPT-5.4 nano (63). It leads on price and context window. GPT-5.4 nano wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 $0.125 · GPT-5.4 nano $0.463 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 1,048,576 · GPT-5.4 nano 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-5.4 nanoLaguna S 2.1: Text · GPT-5.4 nano: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLaguna S 2.1Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Laguna S 2.1 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 93 | 66 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 44 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 63/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Laguna S 2.1Poolside | GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 145.8 |
| ECI rank | — | #75 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 78.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 44.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 87.8% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 11.7% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.20 (best) | $1.25 |
| Cached input | — | $0.02 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.125 (best) | $0.463 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 4 providers | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 400,000 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | poolside/laguna-s-2.1 | gpt-5.4-nano |
| API providers | 6 | 26 (best) |
| Released | Jul 21, 2026 | Mar 17, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Aug 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Laguna S 2.1$1.40
- GPT-5.4 nano$4.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Laguna S 2.1 or GPT-5.4 nano?
Laguna S 2.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against GPT-5.4 nano (63). It leads on price and context window. GPT-5.4 nano wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Laguna S 2.1 or GPT-5.4 nano?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Poolside). GPT-5.4 nano costs $0.20 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Laguna S 2.1 versus $0.463 for GPT-5.4 nano (3.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Laguna S 2.1 has not been scored yet and GPT-5.4 nano has an ECI of 145.8.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna S 2.1 and GPT-5.4 nano yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna S 2.1 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.4 nano. Maximum output per response: Laguna S 2.1 up to 32,768, GPT-5.4 nano up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Laguna S 2.1 accepts text; GPT-5.4 nano accepts text and images. GPT-5.4 nano handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Laguna S 2.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.4 nano is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Laguna S 2.1 is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. GPT-5.4 nano came out Mar 17, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 nano Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemma 4 12B ITThree-way comparison
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Gemma 4 12B ITGoogle
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAI
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Seed CharacterByteDance Seed
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA
- GPT-5.4 nano vs MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax · ECI 145.9
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 143.9
