ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs North Mini Code

Too close to call on our weighted score (North Mini Code 71, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69, Laguna M.1 68). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Poolside

    Laguna M.1

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context262K
  2. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.85
    • Context256K
  3. Cohere

    North Mini Code

    Released Jun 9, 2026

    71/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context256K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (North Mini Code 71/100, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69/100, Laguna M.1 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Laguna M.1 on price and Laguna M.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceLaguna M.1 and North Mini CodeLaguna M.1 Free · North Mini Code Free · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning $0.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLaguna M.1Laguna M.1 262,144 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 256,000 · North Mini Code 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningLaguna M.1: Text · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video · North Mini Code: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLaguna M.1Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNorth Mini Code
Price50%10069100
Inputs & features30%359045
Context window20%373636
Overall100%68/10069/10071/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs North Mini Code specifications side by side
SpecificationLaguna M.1PoolsideNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIANorth Mini CodeCohere
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
InputFree (best)$0.25Free (best)
OutputFree (best)$0.85Free (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)Free (best)$0.40Free (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Poolside APIMedian of 4 providersOfficial Cohere API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)256,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYesYeshigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDpoolside/laguna-m.1nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoningnorth-mini-code-1-0
API providers28 (best)2
ReleasedApr 28, 2026Apr 28, 2026Jun 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Sep 23, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Laguna M.1Free
  • Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning$4.20
  • North Mini CodeFree
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Laguna M.1, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or North Mini Code?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (North Mini Code 71/100, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69/100, Laguna M.1 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Laguna M.1 on price and Laguna M.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Laguna M.1, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or North Mini Code?

Laguna M.1 is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Poolside API price). North Mini Code costs Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.25 input / $0.85 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Nvidia). Laguna M.1 is listed as free.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Laguna M.1 has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning has not been scored yet and North Mini Code has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna M.1, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and North Mini Code yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and 256,000 for North Mini Code. Maximum output per response: Laguna M.1 up to 32,768, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning up to 65,536, North Mini Code up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Laguna M.1 accepts text; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video; North Mini Code accepts text. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

North Mini Code is the newest, released Jun 9, 2026. Laguna M.1 came out Apr 28, 2026; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning came out Apr 28, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: North Mini Code Sep 23, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.