ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Laguna M.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs North Mini Code

Too close to call on our weighted score (North Mini Code 71, Laguna M.1 68, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B 65). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Poolside

    Laguna M.1

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context262K
  2. NVIDIA

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B

    Released Apr 7, 2025

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context128K
  3. Cohere

    North Mini Code

    Released Jun 9, 2026

    71/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context256K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (North Mini Code 71/100, Laguna M.1 68/100, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Laguna M.1 on price and Laguna M.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSame priceLaguna M.1 Free · Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B Free · North Mini Code Free per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLaguna M.1Laguna M.1 262,144 · North Mini Code 256,000 · Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsLaguna M.1: Text · Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B: Text · North Mini Code: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLaguna M.1Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BNorth Mini Code
Price50%100100100
Inputs & features30%353545
Context window20%372436
Overall100%68/10065/10071/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Laguna M.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs North Mini Code specifications side by side
SpecificationLaguna M.1PoolsideLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BNVIDIANorth Mini CodeCohere
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
InputFreeFreeFree
OutputFreeFreeFree
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)FreeFreeFree
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Poolside APIOfficial Nvidia APIOfficial Cohere API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens8,192 tokens64,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesYeshigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDpoolside/laguna-m.1nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1north-mini-code-1-0
API providers2 (best)12 (best)
ReleasedApr 28, 2026Apr 7, 2025Jun 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Sep 23, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Laguna M.1Free
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253BFree
  • North Mini CodeFree
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Laguna M.1, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B or North Mini Code?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (North Mini Code 71/100, Laguna M.1 68/100, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Laguna M.1 on price and Laguna M.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Laguna M.1, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B or North Mini Code?

Laguna M.1, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and North Mini Code cost the same: Free input / Free output per million tokens.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Laguna M.1 has not been scored yet, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B has not been scored yet and North Mini Code has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Laguna M.1, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B and North Mini Code yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for North Mini Code and 128,000 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B. Maximum output per response: Laguna M.1 up to 32,768, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B up to 8,192, North Mini Code up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Laguna M.1 accepts text; Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B accepts text; North Mini Code accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

North Mini Code is the newest, released Jun 9, 2026. Laguna M.1 came out Apr 28, 2026; Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B came out Apr 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: North Mini Code Sep 23, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.