Kimi K2 Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus comes out ahead, 66 to 62 and 58 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Moonshot AIKimi K2 Thinking
58/100- ECI146.0
- Price$0.60 / $2.50
- Context262K
NVIDIANemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
62/100- ECI146.2
- Price$0.50 / $2.50
- Context1M
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 Plus
66/100- ECI146.8
- Price$0.40 / $2.40
- Context1M
Qwen3.5 Plus is our pick
Qwen3.5 Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 66/100 against Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (62) and Kimi K2 Thinking (58). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3.5 PlusCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.5 Plus 146.8 · Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 146.2 · Kimi K2 Thinking 146.0
- Lowest priceQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.5 Plus $0.90 · Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B $1.00 · Kimi K2 Thinking $1.07 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B and Qwen3.5 PlusNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 1,000,000 · Qwen3.5 Plus 1,000,000 · Kimi K2 Thinking 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.5 PlusKimi K2 Thinking: Text · Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: Text · Qwen3.5 Plus: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingKimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Kimi K2 Thinking | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 73 | 73 | 74 |
| Price | 25% | 48 | 50 | 52 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 35 | 45 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 37 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 62/100 | 66/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA | Qwen3.5 PlusAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 146.0 | 146.2 | 146.8 (best) |
| ECI rank | #72 of 148 | #70 of 148 | #65 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 84.2% | 85.4% (best) | 84.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 83.1% | 86.7% (best) | 86.7% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | — | 25.4% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.50 | $0.40 (best) |
| Output | $2.50 | $2.50 | $2.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.15 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.07 | $1.00 | $0.90 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 10 providers | Official Nvidia API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b | qwen3.5-plus |
| API providers | 10 | 21 (best) | 10 |
| Released | Nov 6, 2025 | Jun 4, 2026 | Feb 16, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | — | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Kimi K2 Thinking$11.00
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B$10.00
- Qwen3.5 Plus$8.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Kimi K2 Thinking, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 66/100 against Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (62) and Kimi K2 Thinking (58). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs $0.50 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price); Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 Plus versus $1.00 for Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (1.1× as much) and $1.07 for Kimi K2 Thinking (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3.5 Plus scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.5 Plus 146.8 (#65 of 148), Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 146.2 (#70 of 148) and Kimi K2 Thinking 146.0 (#72 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (144.6–148.1 vs 143.9–148.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 85.4%, Qwen3.5 Plus 84.9%, Kimi K2 Thinking 84.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B 86.7%, Qwen3.5 Plus 86.7%, Kimi K2 Thinking 83.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Kimi K2 Thinking, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B and Qwen3.5 Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.5 Plus leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B and Qwen3.5 Plus have the largest context windows (1,000,000 and 1,000,000 tokens), against 262,144 for Kimi K2 Thinking. Maximum output per response: Kimi K2 Thinking up to 262,144, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B up to 128,000, Qwen3.5 Plus up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Kimi K2 Thinking accepts text; Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B accepts text; Qwen3.5 Plus accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.5 Plus handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.5 Plus is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is the newest, released Jun 4, 2026. Qwen3.5 Plus came out Feb 16, 2026; Kimi K2 Thinking came out Nov 6, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2 Thinking Aug 2024, Qwen3.5 Plus Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Kimi K2 Thinking vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
- Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-5 MiniOpenAI · ECI 145.5
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6 27BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 146.5
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle · ECI 145.1
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs MiniMax-M3MiniMax · ECI 147.0
- Qwen3.5 Plus vs MiniMax-M2.5MiniMax · ECI 146.7
