Kimi K2 Thinking vs Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus comes out ahead, 66 to 63 and 58 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Moonshot AIKimi K2 Thinking
58/100- ECI146.0
- Price$0.60 / $2.50
- Context262K
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
63/100- ECI145.3
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 Plus
66/100- ECI146.8
- Price$0.40 / $2.40
- Context1M
Qwen3.5 Plus is our pick
Qwen3.5 Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 66/100 against Gemini 2.5 Pro (63) and Kimi K2 Thinking (58). It leads on price. Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3.5 PlusCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.5 Plus 146.8 · Kimi K2 Thinking 146.0 · Gemini 2.5 Pro 145.3
- Lowest priceQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.5 Plus $0.90 · Kimi K2 Thinking $1.07 · Gemini 2.5 Pro $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 Pro 1,048,576 · Qwen3.5 Plus 1,000,000 · Kimi K2 Thinking 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 ProKimi K2 Thinking: Text · Gemini 2.5 Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Qwen3.5 Plus: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingKimi K2 ThinkingPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Kimi K2 Thinking | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 73 | 72 | 74 |
| Price | 25% | 48 | 24 | 52 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 35 | 100 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 37 | 61 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 63/100 | 66/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle | Qwen3.5 PlusAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 146.0 | 145.3 | 146.8 (best) |
| ECI rank | #72 of 148 | #78 of 148 | #65 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 84.2% | 85.3% (best) | 84.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 24.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 83.1% | 84.7% | 86.7% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 57.6% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | — | 25.4% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $1.25 | $0.40 (best) |
| Output | $2.50 | $10.00 | $2.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.125 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.07 | $3.44 | $0.90 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $15.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 10 providers | Official Google API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | gemini-2.5-pro | qwen3.5-plus |
| API providers | 10 | 22 (best) | 10 |
| Released | Nov 6, 2025 | Jun 17, 2025 | Feb 16, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Kimi K2 Thinking$11.00
- Gemini 2.5 Pro$32.50
- Qwen3.5 Plus$8.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Kimi K2 Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 66/100 against Gemini 2.5 Pro (63) and Kimi K2 Thinking (58). It leads on price. Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers); Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 Plus versus $1.07 for Kimi K2 Thinking (1.2× as much) and $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Pro (3.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3.5 Plus scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.5 Plus 146.8 (#65 of 148), Kimi K2 Thinking 146.0 (#72 of 148) and Gemini 2.5 Pro 145.3 (#78 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (144.6–148.1 vs 143.4–147.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 2.5 Pro 85.3%, Qwen3.5 Plus 84.9%, Kimi K2 Thinking 84.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.5 Plus 86.7%, Gemini 2.5 Pro 84.7%, Kimi K2 Thinking 83.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Kimi K2 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.5 Plus leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.5 Plus and 262,144 for Kimi K2 Thinking. Maximum output per response: Kimi K2 Thinking up to 262,144, Gemini 2.5 Pro up to 65,536, Qwen3.5 Plus up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Kimi K2 Thinking accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Qwen3.5 Plus accepts text, images and video. Gemini 2.5 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Kimi K2 Thinking publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the newest, released Feb 16, 2026. Kimi K2 Thinking came out Nov 6, 2025; Gemini 2.5 Pro came out Jun 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2 Thinking Aug 2024, Gemini 2.5 Pro Jan 2025, Qwen3.5 Plus Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Kimi K2 Thinking vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
- Kimi K2 Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA · ECI 146.2
- Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-5 MiniOpenAI · ECI 145.5
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs o3OpenAI · ECI 146.9
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic · ECI 146.8
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 142.4
