Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B comes out ahead, 71 to 44 and 34 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Moonshot AIKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
44/100- ECI—
- Price$1.90 / $8.00
- Context262K
- Our pick
NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
71/100- ECI—
- Price$0.05 / $0.20
- Context262K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
34/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context262K
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is our pick
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34). It leads on price. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B $0.087 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $3.00 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed $3.42 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 262,144 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 262,144 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: Text, Images, Video · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: Text · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 25 | 100 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 45 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 44/100 | 71/100 | 34/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.90 | $0.05 (best) | $2.00 |
| Output | $8.00 | $0.20 (best) | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.42 | $0.087 (best) | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 11 providers | Median of 9 providers | Median of 21 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Openqwen3.8-max |
| API model ID | — | nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b | — |
| API providers | 11 | 12 | 21 (best) |
| Released | Jun 12, 2026 | Aug 11, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed$35.00
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B$0.90
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34). It leads on price. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers; free on Nvidia). Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 21 API providers); Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed costs $1.90 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.087 per million tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34× as much) and $3.42 for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (39× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed up to 262,144, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B up to 262,144, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, images and video; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B accepts text; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts text. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (qwen3.8-max), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B came out Aug 11, 2026; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed came out Jun 12, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Command A PlusCohere
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs ParetoUnbiased
- Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Laguna XS 2.1Poolside
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAI
