ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Gemini 3 Pro Preview comes out ahead, 52 to 44 on our weighted score, though Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is 24% cheaper per token.

  1. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed

    Released Jun 12, 2026

    44/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.90 / $8.00
    • Context262K
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 3 Pro Preview

    Released Nov 18, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI153.0
    • Price$2.00 / $12.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is our pick

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed $3.42 · Gemini 3 Pro Preview $4.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3 Pro PreviewKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: Text, Images, Video · Gemini 3 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedGemini 3 Pro Preview
Price50%2519
Inputs & features30%80100
Context window20%3761
Overall100%44/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AIGemini 3 Pro PreviewGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—153.0
ECI rank—#39 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—92.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—91.4%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—72.9%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.90 (best)$2.00
Output$8.00 (best)$12.00
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$3.42 (best)$4.50
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 11 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output262,144 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoYes
VideoYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model ID——
API providers11 (best)3
ReleasedJun 12, 2026Nov 18, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed$35.00
  • Gemini 3 Pro Preview$44.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed (44). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is cheaper at $1.90 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Gemini 3 Pro Preview costs $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.42 per million tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed versus $4.50 for Gemini 3 Pro Preview (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has not been scored yet and Gemini 3 Pro Preview has an ECI of 153.0.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed. Maximum output per response: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed up to 262,144, Gemini 3 Pro Preview up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, images and video; Gemini 3 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3 Pro Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is the newest, released Jun 12, 2026. Gemini 3 Pro Preview came out Nov 18, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed Jan 2025, Gemini 3 Pro Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.