ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Hy4 preview vs Sakana Namazu vs LongCat-2.5-Preview

Too close to call on our weighted score (LongCat-2.5-Preview 52, Sakana Namazu 51, Hy4 preview 45). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Tencent

    Hy4 preview

    Released Aug 28, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.834 / $2.50
    • Context1.02M
  2. Sakana AI

    Sakana Namazu

    Released Aug 3, 2026

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.95 / $4.00
    • Context262K
  3. Meituan (LongCat)

    LongCat-2.5-Preview

    Released Sep 25, 2026

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.75 / $2.95
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (LongCat-2.5-Preview 52/100, Sakana Namazu 51/100, Hy4 preview 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Hy4 preview on price and Hy4 preview for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceHy4 previewHy4 preview $1.25 · LongCat-2.5-Preview $1.30 · Sakana Namazu $1.71 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextHy4 previewHy4 preview 1,024,000 · LongCat-2.5-Preview 1,000,000 · Sakana Namazu 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsSakana NamazuHy4 preview: Text · Sakana Namazu: Text, Images, PDFs · LongCat-2.5-Preview: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingHy4 previewPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightHy4 previewSakana NamazuLongCat-2.5-Preview
Price50%453944
Inputs & features30%358060
Context window20%603760
Overall100%45/10051/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Hy4 preview vs Sakana Namazu vs LongCat-2.5-Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationHy4 previewTencentSakana NamazuSakana AILongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.834$0.95$0.75 (best)
Output$2.50 (best)$4.00$2.95
Cached input$0.042 (best)$0.15—
Blended (3:1)$1.25 (best)$1.71$1.30
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Tencent TokenHub APIOfficial Sakana AI APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window1,024,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output64,000 tokens65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeshighYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model IDhy4-previewsakana-namazu—
API providers13 (best)52
ReleasedAug 28, 2026Aug 3, 2026Sep 25, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Hy4 preview$13.34
  • Sakana Namazu$17.50
  • LongCat-2.5-Preview$13.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Hy4 preview, Sakana Namazu or LongCat-2.5-Preview?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (LongCat-2.5-Preview 52/100, Sakana Namazu 51/100, Hy4 preview 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Hy4 preview on price and Hy4 preview for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview, Sakana Namazu or LongCat-2.5-Preview?

Hy4 preview is cheaper at $0.834 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Tencent TokenHub API price). LongCat-2.5-Preview costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Sakana Namazu costs $0.95 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Sakana AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.25 per million tokens for Hy4 preview versus $1.30 for LongCat-2.5-Preview (1× as much) and $1.71 for Sakana Namazu (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Hy4 preview has not been scored yet, Sakana Namazu has not been scored yet and LongCat-2.5-Preview has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Hy4 preview, Sakana Namazu and LongCat-2.5-Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview has the largest context window at 1,024,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for LongCat-2.5-Preview and 262,144 for Sakana Namazu. Maximum output per response: Hy4 preview up to 64,000, Sakana Namazu up to 65,536, LongCat-2.5-Preview up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Hy4 preview accepts text; Sakana Namazu accepts text, images and PDFs; LongCat-2.5-Preview accepts text and images. Sakana Namazu handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Hy4 preview publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Sakana Namazu and LongCat-2.5-Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

LongCat-2.5-Preview is the newest, released Sep 25, 2026. Hy4 preview came out Aug 28, 2026; Sakana Namazu came out Aug 3, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.