Hy4 preview vs LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Ornith 1.0 31B
LongCat-2.5-Preview comes out ahead, 60 to 51 and 45 on our weighted score.
TencentHy4 preview
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.834 / $2.50
- Context1.02M
- Our pick
Meituan (LongCat)LongCat-2.5-Preview
60/100- ECI—
- Price$0.75 / $2.95
- Context1M
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.0 31B
51/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context262K
LongCat-2.5-Preview is our pick
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against Ornith 1.0 31B (51) and Hy4 preview (45). The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceHy4 previewHy4 preview $1.25 · LongCat-2.5-Preview $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Ornith 1.0 31B unpriced
- Longest contextHy4 previewHy4 preview 1,024,000 · LongCat-2.5-Preview 1,000,000 · Ornith 1.0 31B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsLongCat-2.5-Preview and Ornith 1.0 31BHy4 preview: Text · LongCat-2.5-Preview: Text, Images · Ornith 1.0 31B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingHy4 preview and Ornith 1.0 31BPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | Hy4 preview | LongCat-2.5-Preview | Ornith 1.0 31B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 35 | 60 | 60 |
| Context window | 40% | 60 | 60 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 45/100 | 60/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Hy4 previewTencent | LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat) | Ornith 1.0 31BDeepReinforce |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.834 | $0.75 (best) | — |
| Output | $2.50 (best) | $2.95 | — |
| Cached input | $0.042 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.25 (best) | $1.30 | — |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | — |
| Price source | Official Tencent TokenHub API | Median of 1 providers | — |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,024,000 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | — |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeshigh | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | hy4-preview | — | — |
| API providers | 13 (best) | 2 | — |
| Released | Aug 28, 2026 | Sep 25, 2026 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Hy4 preview$13.34
- LongCat-2.5-Preview$13.40
- Ornith 1.0 31B—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Hy4 preview, LongCat-2.5-Preview or Ornith 1.0 31B?
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against Ornith 1.0 31B (51) and Hy4 preview (45). The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview, LongCat-2.5-Preview or Ornith 1.0 31B?
Hy4 preview is cheaper at $0.834 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Tencent TokenHub API price). LongCat-2.5-Preview costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.25 per million tokens for Hy4 preview versus $1.30 for LongCat-2.5-Preview (1× as much). Ornith 1.0 31B has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Hy4 preview has not been scored yet, LongCat-2.5-Preview has not been scored yet and Ornith 1.0 31B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Hy4 preview, LongCat-2.5-Preview and Ornith 1.0 31B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy4 preview has the largest context window at 1,024,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for LongCat-2.5-Preview and 262,144 for Ornith 1.0 31B. Maximum output per response: Hy4 preview up to 64,000, LongCat-2.5-Preview up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Hy4 preview accepts text; LongCat-2.5-Preview accepts text and images; Ornith 1.0 31B accepts text and images. LongCat-2.5-Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Hy4 preview and Ornith 1.0 31B publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; LongCat-2.5-Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the newest, released Sep 25, 2026. Hy4 preview came out Aug 28, 2026; Ornith 1.0 31B came out Jun 25, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
