Hy4 preview vs LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Motif 3
LongCat-2.5-Preview comes out ahead, 52 to 45 and 44 on our weighted score, though Motif 3 is 33% cheaper per token.
TencentHy4 preview
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.834 / $2.50
- Context1.02M
- Our pick
Meituan (LongCat)LongCat-2.5-Preview
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.75 / $2.95
- Context1M
Motif Technologies
Motif 3
44/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $2.00
- Context262K
LongCat-2.5-Preview is our pick
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Hy4 preview (45) and Motif 3 (44). It leads on inputs & features. Motif 3 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMotif 3Motif 3 $0.875 · Hy4 preview $1.25 · LongCat-2.5-Preview $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextHy4 previewHy4 preview 1,024,000 · LongCat-2.5-Preview 1,000,000 · Motif 3 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsLongCat-2.5-PreviewHy4 preview: Text · LongCat-2.5-Preview: Text, Images · Motif 3: Text
- Self-hostingHy4 preview and Motif 3Publishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | Hy4 preview | LongCat-2.5-Preview | Motif 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 45 | 44 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 60 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 60 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 45/100 | 52/100 | 44/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Hy4 previewTencent | LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat) | Motif 3Motif Technologies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.834 | $0.75 | $0.50 (best) |
| Output | $2.50 | $2.95 | $2.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.042 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.25 | $1.30 | $0.875 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Tencent TokenHub API | Median of 1 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,024,000 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeshigh | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | hy4-preview | — | — |
| API providers | 13 (best) | 2 | 1 |
| Released | Aug 28, 2026 | Sep 25, 2026 | Aug 7, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Hy4 preview$13.34
- LongCat-2.5-Preview$13.40
- Motif 3$9.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Hy4 preview, LongCat-2.5-Preview or Motif 3?
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Hy4 preview (45) and Motif 3 (44). It leads on inputs & features. Motif 3 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview, LongCat-2.5-Preview or Motif 3?
Motif 3 is cheaper at $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Hy4 preview costs $0.834 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Tencent TokenHub API price); LongCat-2.5-Preview costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.875 per million tokens for Motif 3 versus $1.25 for Hy4 preview (1.4× as much) and $1.30 for LongCat-2.5-Preview (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Hy4 preview has not been scored yet, LongCat-2.5-Preview has not been scored yet and Motif 3 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Hy4 preview, LongCat-2.5-Preview and Motif 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy4 preview has the largest context window at 1,024,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for LongCat-2.5-Preview and 262,144 for Motif 3. Maximum output per response: Hy4 preview up to 64,000, LongCat-2.5-Preview up to 131,072, Motif 3 up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Hy4 preview accepts text; LongCat-2.5-Preview accepts text and images; Motif 3 accepts text. LongCat-2.5-Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Hy4 preview and Motif 3 publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; LongCat-2.5-Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the newest, released Sep 25, 2026. Hy4 preview came out Aug 28, 2026; Motif 3 came out Aug 7, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
