Hy3 preview vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Qwen3.8 Flash comes out ahead, 76 to 56 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
TencentHy3 preview
56/100- ECI—
- Price$0.176 / $0.586
- Context256K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Flash
76/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.47
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.8 Flash is our pick
Qwen3.8 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Hy3 preview (56). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Flash $0.23 · Hy3 preview $0.279 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Flash 1,000,000 · Hy3 preview 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 FlashHy3 preview: Text · Qwen3.8 Flash: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingHy3 previewPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Hy3 preview | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 76 | 80 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 56/100 | 76/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Hy3 previewTencent | Qwen3.8 FlashAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.176 | $0.15 (best) |
| Output | $0.586 | $0.47 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.016 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.279 | $0.23 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 4 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yeslow · medium · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | hy3-preview | qwen3.8-flash |
| API providers | 5 | 23 (best) |
| Released | Apr 20, 2026 | Aug 26, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Hy3 preview$2.93
- Qwen3.8 Flash$2.44
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Hy3 preview or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Hy3 preview (56). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 preview or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.47 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Hy3 preview costs $0.176 input / $0.586 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Tencent TokenHub). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.23 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 Flash versus $0.279 for Hy3 preview (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Hy3 preview has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Hy3 preview and Qwen3.8 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 256,000 for Hy3 preview. Maximum output per response: Hy3 preview up to 64,000, Qwen3.8 Flash up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Hy3 preview accepts text; Qwen3.8 Flash accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.8 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Hy3 preview publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 Flash is the newest, released Aug 26, 2026. Hy3 preview came out Apr 20, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
