Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs Qwen3 Max
Claude Haiku 4.5 comes out ahead, 48 to 34 and 31 on our weighted score, though Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is 6% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
48/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context200K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
34/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $6.00
- Context131K
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3 Max
31/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.20 / $6.00
- Context262K
Claude Haiku 4.5 is our pick
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34) and Qwen3 Max (31). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Max wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) $1.88 · Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 · Qwen3 Max $2.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 MaxQwen3 Max 262,144 · Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Text · Qwen3 Max: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 36 | 37 | 32 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 35 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 24 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 48/100 | 34/100 | 31/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Alibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 142.4 (best) | — | 142.4 |
| ECI rank | #90 of 148 (best) | — | #91 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 71.2% | — | 72.6% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | — | 19.0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 66.7% | — | 73.3% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 13.2% | — | 48.8% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.50 (best) | $1.20 |
| Output | $5.00 (best) | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | $0.10 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 | $1.88 (best) | $2.40 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | claude-haiku-4-5 | qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking | qwen3-max |
| API providers | 34 (best) | 10 | 16 |
| Released | Oct 15, 2025 | Sep 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 28, 2025 | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)$17.00
- Qwen3 Max$24.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Haiku 4.5, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) or Qwen3 Max?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34) and Qwen3 Max (31). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Max wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) or Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is cheaper at $0.50 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price); Qwen3 Max costs $1.20 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.88 per million tokens for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) versus $2.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (1.1× as much) and $2.40 for Qwen3 Max (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Claude Haiku 4.5 has an ECI of 142.4, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) has not been scored yet and Qwen3 Max has an ECI of 142.4.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 4.5, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) and Qwen3 Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Max has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 131,072 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking). Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) up to 32,768, Qwen3 Max up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) accepts text; Qwen3 Max accepts text. Claude Haiku 4.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 Max is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the newest, released Oct 15, 2025. Qwen3 Max came out Sep 23, 2025; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) came out Sep 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) Apr 2025, Qwen3 Max Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI · ECI 141.4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI · ECI 146.0
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs Apertus 70BSwiss AI
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs Palmyra X5Writer
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs GPT-5-CodexOpenAI
