Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Claude Haiku 4.5 comes out ahead, 48 to 39 on our weighted score, though Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is 2.3× cheaper per token.
- Our pick
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
48/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context200K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
39/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $2.00
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is our pick
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (39). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct $0.875 · Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 36 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 48/100 | 39/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 142.4 | — |
| ECI rank | #90 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 71.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 66.7% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 13.2% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.50 (best) |
| Output | $5.00 | $2.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.10 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.875 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | claude-haiku-4-5 | qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct |
| API providers | 34 (best) | 13 |
| Released | Oct 15, 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 28, 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct$9.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (39). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.875 per million tokens for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct versus $2.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (2.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Claude Haiku 4.5 has an ECI of 142.4 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct accepts text. Claude Haiku 4.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 4.5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the newest, released Oct 15, 2025. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct came out Sep 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3 MaxThree-way comparison
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 142.4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI · ECI 141.4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI · ECI 146.0
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
