Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
Too close to call on our weighted score (MiniMax-M2.7 61, Claude Haiku 4.5 58). The right pick depends on what you value most.
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
58/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context200K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7
61/100- ECI145.9
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context205K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (MiniMax-M2.7 61/100, Claude Haiku 4.5 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiniMax-M2.7 for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityMiniMax-M2.7Capabilities Index (ECI): MiniMax-M2.7 145.9 · Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4
- Lowest priceMiniMax-M2.7MiniMax-M2.7 $0.525 · Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiniMax-M2.7MiniMax-M2.7 204,800 · Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs · MiniMax-M2.7: Text
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.7Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 69 | 73 |
| Price | 25% | 36 | 63 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 32 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 61/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 142.4 | 145.9 (best) |
| ECI rank | #90 of 148 | #73 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 71.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 66.7% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 13.2% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.30 (best) |
| Output | $5.00 | $1.20 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.10 | $0.06 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.525 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 204,800 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | claude-haiku-4-5 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
| API providers | 34 (best) | 29 |
| Released | Oct 15, 2025 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 28, 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
- MiniMax-M2.7$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiniMax-M2.7?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (MiniMax-M2.7 61/100, Claude Haiku 4.5 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiniMax-M2.7 for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for MiniMax-M2.7 versus $2.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (3.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): MiniMax-M2.7 145.9 (#73 of 148) and Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4 (#90 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (138.2–148.0 vs 139.5–144.3), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax-M2.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, MiniMax-M2.7 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M2.7 has the largest context window at 204,800 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000, MiniMax-M2.7 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; MiniMax-M2.7 accepts text. Claude Haiku 4.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.7 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 4.5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiniMax-M2.7 is the newest, released Mar 18, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5 came out Oct 15, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3 MaxThree-way comparison
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 142.4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI · ECI 141.4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI · ECI 146.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI · ECI 145.8
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 143.9
