Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 58 and 55 on our weighted score, though Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 18% cheaper per token.
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
58/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context200K
- Our pick
MetaLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
62/100- ECI129.7
- Price$0.225 / $0.69
- Context10M
Mistral AIMistral Small 3.1 24B
55/100- ECI127.5
- Price$0.229 / $0.436
- Context128K
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is our pick
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Claude Haiku 4.5 (58) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B (55). It leads on context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on capability and inputs & features. Mistral Small 3.1 24B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B 127.5
- Lowest priceMistral Small 3.1 24BMistral Small 3.1 24B $0.281 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 · Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images · Mistral Small 3.1 24B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct and Mistral Small 3.1 24BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 24B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 69 | 52 | 50 |
| Price | 25% | 36 | 72 | 76 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 50 | 60 |
| Context window | 10% | 32 | 100 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 62/100 | 55/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructMeta | Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 142.4 (best) | 129.7 | 127.5 |
| ECI rank | #90 of 148 (best) | #126 of 148 | #132 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 71.2% (best) | 51.8% | 47.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 66.7% (best) | 7.8% | 5.8% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 13.2% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.225 (best) | $0.229 |
| Output | $5.00 | $0.69 | $0.436 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.10 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.341 | $0.281 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Median of 4 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | claude-haiku-4-5 | — | — |
| API providers | 34 (best) | 4 | 2 |
| Released | Oct 15, 2025 | Apr 5, 2025 | Mar 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 28, 2025 | Aug 2024 | Jun 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
- Mistral Small 3.1 24B$3.16
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Haiku 4.5, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Claude Haiku 4.5 (58) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B (55). It leads on context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on capability and inputs & features. Mistral Small 3.1 24B wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is cheaper at $0.229 input / $0.436 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct costs $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.281 per million tokens for Mistral Small 3.1 24B versus $0.341 for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (1.2× as much) and $2.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (7.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4 (#90 of 148), Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B 127.5 (#132 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (139.5–144.3 vs 124.8–131.4), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Claude Haiku 4.5 71.2%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 47.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Haiku 4.5 66.7%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 5.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 4.5, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct and Mistral Small 3.1 24B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Haiku 4.5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384, Mistral Small 3.1 24B up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images; Mistral Small 3.1 24B accepts text and images. Claude Haiku 4.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct and Mistral Small 3.1 24B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 4.5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the newest, released Oct 15, 2025. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct came out Apr 5, 2025; Mistral Small 3.1 24B came out Mar 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Jun 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 142.4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI · ECI 141.4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI · ECI 146.0
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek · ECI 132.3
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Gemma 3 27B ITGoogle · ECI 130.0
