ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3 Max

Grok 4.3 comes out ahead, 67 to 58 and 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Anthropic

    Claude Haiku 4.5

    Released Oct 15, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI142.4
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context200K
    Full specs Remove Claude Haiku 4.5
  2. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok 4.3

    Released Apr 17, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI149.2
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Grok 4.3

  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 Max

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI142.4
    • Price$1.20 / $6.00
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3 Max
01 — Verdict

Grok 4.3 is our pick

Grok 4.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Claude Haiku 4.5 (58) and Qwen3 Max (50). It leads on capability, price and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGrok 4.3Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.3 149.2 · Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4 · Qwen3 Max 142.4
  • Lowest priceGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 $1.56 · Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 · Qwen3 Max $2.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 1,000,000 · Qwen3 Max 262,144 · Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsClaude Haiku 4.5 and Grok 4.3Claude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Grok 4.3: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3 Max: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightClaude Haiku 4.5Grok 4.3Qwen3 Max
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%697768
Price25%364132
Inputs & features15%808025
Context window10%326037
Overall100%58/10067/10050/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3 Max specifications side by side
SpecificationClaude Haiku 4.5AnthropicGrok 4.3xAIQwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)142.4149.2 (best)142.4
ECI rank#90 of 148#55 of 148 (best)#91 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions71.2%88.8% (best)72.6%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—42.8% (best)19.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics66.7%93.3% (best)73.3%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions13.2%33.2%48.8% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00 (best)$1.25$1.20
Output$5.00$2.50 (best)$6.00
Cached input$0.10 (best)$0.20—
Blended (3:1)$2.00$1.56 (best)$2.40
Long-context rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Anthropic APIOfficial xAI APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output64,000 tokens30,000 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsYesYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · highNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDclaude-haiku-4-5grok-4.3qwen3-max
API providers34 (best)2716
ReleasedOct 15, 2025Apr 17, 2026Sep 23, 2025
Knowledge cutoffFeb 28, 2025—Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
  • Grok 4.3$17.50
  • Qwen3 Max$24.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3 Max?

Grok 4.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Claude Haiku 4.5 (58) and Qwen3 Max (50). It leads on capability, price and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3 Max?

Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price); Qwen3 Max costs $1.20 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.3 versus $2.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (1.3× as much) and $2.40 for Qwen3 Max (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.3 149.2 (#55 of 148), Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4 (#90 of 148) and Qwen3 Max 142.4 (#91 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (147.6–150.8 vs 139.5–144.3), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.3 88.8%, Qwen3 Max 72.6%, Claude Haiku 4.5 71.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Grok 4.3 93.3%, Qwen3 Max 73.3%, Claude Haiku 4.5 66.7%; SimpleQA Verified — Qwen3 Max 48.8%, Grok 4.3 33.2%, Claude Haiku 4.5 13.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.3 and Qwen3 Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3 Max and 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000, Grok 4.3 up to 30,000, Qwen3 Max up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Grok 4.3 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3 Max accepts text. Claude Haiku 4.5 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.3 and Qwen3 Max are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Grok 4.3 is the newest, released Apr 17, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5 came out Oct 15, 2025; Qwen3 Max came out Sep 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025, Qwen3 Max Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons