ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro comes out ahead, 63 to 58 on our weighted score, though Claude Haiku 4.5 is 42% cheaper per token.

  1. Anthropic

    Claude Haiku 4.5

    Released Oct 15, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI142.4
    • Price$1.00 / $5.00
    • Context200K
    Full specs Remove Claude Haiku 4.5
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Pro

    Released Jun 17, 2025

    63/100
    • ECI145.3
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Gemini 2.5 Pro

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Pro is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Claude Haiku 4.5 (58). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemini 2.5 ProCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Pro 145.3 · Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4
  • Lowest priceClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 · Gemini 2.5 Pro $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 Pro 1,048,576 · Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 ProClaude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemini 2.5 Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Pro
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%6972
Price25%3624
Inputs & features15%80100
Context window10%3261
Overall100%58/10063/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro specifications side by side
SpecificationClaude Haiku 4.5AnthropicGemini 2.5 ProGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)142.4145.3 (best)
ECI rank#90 of 148#78 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions71.2%85.3% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—24.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics66.7%84.7% (best)
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—57.6%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions13.2%—
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00 (best)$1.25
Output$5.00 (best)$10.00
Cached input$0.10 (best)$0.125
Blended (3:1)$2.00 (best)$3.44
Long-context rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $15.00
Price sourceOfficial Anthropic APIOfficial Google API
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output64,000 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesYes
AudioNoYes
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDclaude-haiku-4-5gemini-2.5-pro
API providers34 (best)22
ReleasedOct 15, 2025Jun 17, 2025
Knowledge cutoffFeb 28, 2025Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro$32.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Claude Haiku 4.5 (58). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Claude Haiku 4.5 versus $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Pro (1.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Pro 145.3 (#78 of 148) and Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4 (#90 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (143.6–146.9 vs 139.5–144.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 2.5 Pro 85.3%, Claude Haiku 4.5 71.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemini 2.5 Pro 84.7%, Claude Haiku 4.5 66.7%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 4.5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000, Gemini 2.5 Pro up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 2.5 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the newest, released Oct 15, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Pro came out Jun 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025, Gemini 2.5 Pro Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons