ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Claude Haiku 3 vs Mixtral 8x7B vs Sonar

Claude Haiku 3 comes out ahead, 56 to 36 and 30 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Anthropic

    Claude Haiku 3

    Released Mar 13, 2024

    56/100
    • ECI118.4
    • Price$0.25 / $1.25
    • Context200K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mixtral 8x7B

    Released Dec 11, 2023

    36/100
    • ECI118.5
    • Price$0.70 / $0.70
    • Context32K
  3. Perplexity

    Sonar

    Released Jan 1, 2024

    30/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $1.00
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Claude Haiku 3 is our pick

Claude Haiku 3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Mixtral 8x7B (36) and Sonar (30). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceClaude Haiku 3Claude Haiku 3 $0.50 · Mixtral 8x7B $0.70 · Sonar $1.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextClaude Haiku 3Claude Haiku 3 200,000 · Sonar 128,000 · Mixtral 8x7B 32,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsClaude Haiku 3Claude Haiku 3: Text, Images, PDFs · Mixtral 8x7B: Text · Sonar: Text
  • Self-hostingMixtral 8x7BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightClaude Haiku 3Mixtral 8x7BSonar
Price50%645750
Inputs & features30%60250
Context window20%32024
Overall100%56/10036/10030/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Claude Haiku 3 vs Mixtral 8x7B vs Sonar specifications side by side
SpecificationClaude Haiku 3AnthropicMixtral 8x7BMistral AISonarPerplexity
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)118.4118.5 (best)—
ECI rank#143 of 148#142 of 148 (best)—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions36.3% (best)30.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics1.8%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.25 (best)$0.70$1.00
Output$1.25$0.70 (best)$1.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.50 (best)$0.70$1.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Perplexity API
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens (best)32,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output4,096 tokens32,000 tokens (best)4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model ID—open-mixtral-8x7bsonar
API providers216 (best)
ReleasedMar 13, 2024Dec 11, 2023Jan 1, 2024
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2023Jan 2024Sep 1, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Claude Haiku 3$5.00
  • Mixtral 8x7B$8.40
  • Sonar$12.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Claude Haiku 3, Mixtral 8x7B or Sonar?

Claude Haiku 3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Mixtral 8x7B (36) and Sonar (30). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 3, Mixtral 8x7B or Sonar?

Claude Haiku 3 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Mixtral 8x7B costs $0.70 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Sonar costs $1.00 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (official Perplexity API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.50 per million tokens for Claude Haiku 3 versus $0.70 for Mixtral 8x7B (1.4× as much) and $1.00 for Sonar (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Claude Haiku 3 has an ECI of 118.4, Mixtral 8x7B has an ECI of 118.5 and Sonar has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 3, Mixtral 8x7B and Sonar yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Sonar does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 3 has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Sonar and 32,000 for Mixtral 8x7B. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 3 up to 4,096, Mixtral 8x7B up to 32,000, Sonar up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Claude Haiku 3 accepts text, images and PDFs; Mixtral 8x7B accepts text; Sonar accepts text. Claude Haiku 3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mixtral 8x7B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 3 and Sonar is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Claude Haiku 3 is the newest, released Mar 13, 2024. Sonar came out Jan 1, 2024; Mixtral 8x7B came out Dec 11, 2023. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 3 Aug 31, 2023, Mixtral 8x7B Jan 2024, Sonar Sep 1, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.