Claude Haiku 3 vs GPT-4o mini vs Mixtral 8x7B
GPT-4o mini comes out ahead, 56 to 47 and 37 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
AnthropicClaude Haiku 3
47/100- ECI118.4
- Price$0.25 / $1.25
- Context200K
- Our pick
OpenAIGPT-4o mini
56/100- ECI126.6
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
Mistral AIMixtral 8x7B
37/100- ECI118.5
- Price$0.70 / $0.70
- Context32K
GPT-4o mini is our pick
GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Claude Haiku 3 (47) and Mixtral 8x7B (37). It leads on capability, price and inputs & features. Claude Haiku 3 wins on context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-4o miniCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 · Mixtral 8x7B 118.5 · Claude Haiku 3 118.4
- Lowest priceGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini $0.263 · Claude Haiku 3 $0.50 · Mixtral 8x7B $0.70 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextClaude Haiku 3Claude Haiku 3 200,000 · GPT-4o mini 128,000 · Mixtral 8x7B 32,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 3 and GPT-4o miniClaude Haiku 3: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Mixtral 8x7B: Text
- Self-hostingMixtral 8x7BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Claude Haiku 3 | GPT-4o mini | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 38 | 49 | 38 |
| Price | 25% | 64 | 77 | 57 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 60 | 70 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 32 | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 47/100 | 56/100 | 37/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Haiku 3Anthropic | GPT-4o miniOpenAI | Mixtral 8x7BMistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 118.4 | 126.6 (best) | 118.5 |
| ECI rank | #143 of 148 | #135 of 148 (best) | #142 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 36.3% | 37.7% (best) | 30.6% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 0.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 1.8% | 6.9% (best) | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 8.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.25 | $0.15 (best) | $0.70 |
| Output | $1.25 | $0.60 (best) | $0.70 |
| Cached input | — | $0.075 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.50 | $0.263 (best) | $0.70 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Official OpenAI API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 200,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 32,000 tokens |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 32,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | gpt-4o-mini | open-mixtral-8x7b |
| API providers | 2 | 21 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Mar 13, 2024 | Jul 18, 2024 | Dec 11, 2023 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 31, 2023 | Sep 2023 | Jan 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Haiku 3$5.00
- GPT-4o mini$2.70
- Mixtral 8x7B$8.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Haiku 3, GPT-4o mini or Mixtral 8x7B?
GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Claude Haiku 3 (47) and Mixtral 8x7B (37). It leads on capability, price and inputs & features. Claude Haiku 3 wins on context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 3, GPT-4o mini or Mixtral 8x7B?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Claude Haiku 3 costs $0.25 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Mixtral 8x7B costs $0.70 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for GPT-4o mini versus $0.50 for Claude Haiku 3 (1.9× as much) and $0.70 for Mixtral 8x7B (2.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-4o mini scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148), Mixtral 8x7B 118.5 (#142 of 148) and Claude Haiku 3 118.4 (#143 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (120.5–128.5 vs 111.3–121.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-4o mini 37.7%, Claude Haiku 3 36.3%, Mixtral 8x7B 30.6%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Haiku 3, GPT-4o mini and Mixtral 8x7B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-4o mini leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Haiku 3 has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 128,000 for GPT-4o mini and 32,000 for Mixtral 8x7B. Maximum output per response: Claude Haiku 3 up to 4,096, GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Mixtral 8x7B up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Haiku 3 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Mixtral 8x7B accepts text. Claude Haiku 3 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Mixtral 8x7B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 3 and GPT-4o mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GPT-4o mini is the newest, released Jul 18, 2024. Claude Haiku 3 came out Mar 13, 2024; Mixtral 8x7B came out Dec 11, 2023. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Haiku 3 Aug 31, 2023, GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Mixtral 8x7B Jan 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 3 vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
- Claude Haiku 3 vs Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta · ECI 116.6
- GPT-4o mini vs Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI · ECI 127.5
- GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-InstructMeta · ECI 125.9
- GPT-4o mini vs Claude Haiku 3.5Anthropic · ECI 127.2
- GPT-4o mini vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
