Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B comes out ahead, 58 to 54 and 41 on our weighted score.
xAIGrok Build 0.1
54/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $2.00
- Context256K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $3.20
- Context262K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is our pick
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Grok Build 0.1 (54) and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 · Grok Build 0.1 $1.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · Grok Build 0.1 256,000 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.5 122B-A10BGrok Build 0.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3.5 122B-A10B and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 45 | 48 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 90 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 37 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 58/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok Build 0.1xAI | Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen) | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 | $0.40 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.00 (best) | $3.20 | $2.40 |
| Cached input | $0.20 | — | $0.06 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.25 | $1.10 | $1.05 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $2.00 / $4.00 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Official Alibaba API | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 256,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | grok-build-0.1 | qwen3.5-122b-a10b | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed |
| API providers | 19 (best) | 19 (best) | 14 |
| Released | Apr 16, 2026 | Feb 23, 2026 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok Build 0.1$14.00
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok Build 0.1, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Grok Build 0.1 (54) and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is cheaper at $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Grok Build 0.1 costs $1.00 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.05 per million tokens for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed versus $1.10 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (1× as much) and $1.25 for Grok Build 0.1 (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Grok Build 0.1 has not been scored yet, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok Build 0.1, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Grok Build 0.1 and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. Maximum output per response: Grok Build 0.1 up to 256,000, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok Build 0.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images, audio and video; MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Grok Build 0.1 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Grok Build 0.1 is the newest, released Apr 16, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
