ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Grok Build 0.1 vs Hy4 preview vs LongCat-2.5-Preview

Too close to call on our weighted score (Grok Build 0.1 54, LongCat-2.5-Preview 52, Hy4 preview 45). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. xAI

    Grok Build 0.1

    Released Apr 16, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $2.00
    • Context256K
  2. Tencent

    Hy4 preview

    Released Aug 28, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.834 / $2.50
    • Context1.02M
  3. Meituan (LongCat)

    LongCat-2.5-Preview

    Released Sep 25, 2026

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.75 / $2.95
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Grok Build 0.1 54/100, LongCat-2.5-Preview 52/100, Hy4 preview 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok Build 0.1 on price and Hy4 preview for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGrok Build 0.1Grok Build 0.1 $1.25 · Hy4 preview $1.25 · LongCat-2.5-Preview $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextHy4 previewHy4 preview 1,024,000 · LongCat-2.5-Preview 1,000,000 · Grok Build 0.1 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGrok Build 0.1Grok Build 0.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Hy4 preview: Text · LongCat-2.5-Preview: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingHy4 previewPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok Build 0.1Hy4 previewLongCat-2.5-Preview
Price50%454544
Inputs & features30%803560
Context window20%366060
Overall100%54/10045/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok Build 0.1 vs Hy4 preview vs LongCat-2.5-Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok Build 0.1xAIHy4 previewTencentLongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00$0.834$0.75 (best)
Output$2.00 (best)$2.50$2.95
Cached input$0.20$0.042 (best)—
Blended (3:1)$1.25 (best)$1.25$1.30
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.00 / $4.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial xAI APIOfficial Tencent TokenHub APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens1,024,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output256,000 tokens (best)64,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYeshighYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDgrok-build-0.1hy4-preview—
API providers19 (best)132
ReleasedApr 16, 2026Aug 28, 2026Sep 25, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok Build 0.1$14.00
  • Hy4 preview$13.34
  • LongCat-2.5-Preview$13.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok Build 0.1, Hy4 preview or LongCat-2.5-Preview?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Grok Build 0.1 54/100, LongCat-2.5-Preview 52/100, Hy4 preview 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok Build 0.1 on price and Hy4 preview for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1, Hy4 preview or LongCat-2.5-Preview?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1.00 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Hy4 preview costs $0.834 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Tencent TokenHub API price); LongCat-2.5-Preview costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.25 per million tokens for Grok Build 0.1 versus $1.25 for Hy4 preview (1× as much) and $1.30 for LongCat-2.5-Preview (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Grok Build 0.1 has not been scored yet, Hy4 preview has not been scored yet and LongCat-2.5-Preview has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok Build 0.1, Hy4 preview and LongCat-2.5-Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview has the largest context window at 1,024,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for LongCat-2.5-Preview and 256,000 for Grok Build 0.1. Maximum output per response: Grok Build 0.1 up to 256,000, Hy4 preview up to 64,000, LongCat-2.5-Preview up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok Build 0.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Hy4 preview accepts text; LongCat-2.5-Preview accepts text and images. Grok Build 0.1 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Hy4 preview publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Grok Build 0.1 and LongCat-2.5-Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

LongCat-2.5-Preview is the newest, released Sep 25, 2026. Hy4 preview came out Aug 28, 2026; Grok Build 0.1 came out Apr 16, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.