Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash comes out ahead, 79 to 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
xAIGrok 4.7
47/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context500K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
79/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.47
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is our pick
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Grok 4.7 (47). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.8 Omni FlashQwen3.8 Omni Flash $0.23 · Grok 4.7 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.8 Omni FlashQwen3.8 Omni Flash 1,000,000 · Grok 4.7 500,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.7: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 27 | 80 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 90 |
| Context window | 20% | 48 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 47/100 | 79/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4.7xAI | Qwen3.8 Omni FlashAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 92.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 53.0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 98.1% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 56.0% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.15 (best) |
| Output | $6.00 | $0.47 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.50 | $0.016 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $0.23 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $12.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 500,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 500,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yeslow · medium · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | grok-4.7 | qwen3.8-omni-flash |
| API providers | 17 (best) | 10 |
| Released | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 17, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4.7$32.00
- Qwen3.8 Omni Flash$2.44
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Grok 4.7 (47). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.47 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.23 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash versus $3.00 for Grok 4.7 (13× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Grok 4.7 has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 500,000 for Grok 4.7. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.7 up to 500,000, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.7 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash accepts text, images, audio and video. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.7 is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash came out Sep 17, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.7 May 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
