Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.8 Max 0902 63, Grok 4.7 61, Qwen3.7 Max 55). The right pick depends on what you value most.
xAIGrok 4.7
61/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context500K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.7 Max
55/100- ECI153.7
- Price$2.50 / $7.50
- Context1M
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
63/100- ECI155.2
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.8 Max 0902 63/100, Grok 4.7 61/100, Qwen3.7 Max 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.7 Max for raw capability and Grok 4.7 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because Grok 4.7 has no Capabilities Index score yet.
- CapabilityQwen3.7 MaxShared benchmarks: Qwen3.7 Max 76.7% · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 76.3% · Grok 4.7 74.9%
- Lowest priceGrok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.7 $3.00 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 $3.00 · Qwen3.7 Max $3.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902Qwen3.7 Max 1,000,000 · Qwen3.8 Max 0902 1,000,000 · Grok 4.7 500,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 Max 0902Grok 4.7: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.7 Max: Text · Qwen3.8 Max 0902: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3.8 Max 0902 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityShared benchmarks | 50% | 75 | 77 | 76 |
| Price | 25% | 27 | 23 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 48 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 61/100 | 55/100 | 63/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4.7xAI | Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3.8 Max 0902Alibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 153.7 | 155.2 (best) |
| ECI rank | — | #37 of 148 | #28 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 92.7% (best) | 90.9% | 92.3% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 53.0% | 64.6% | 65.6% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 98.1% | 95.6% | 100% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 77.3% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 56.0% (best) | 55.8% | 47.3% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.00 (best) | $2.50 | $2.00 (best) |
| Output | $6.00 (best) | $7.50 | $6.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.50 | $0.50 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 (best) | $3.75 | $3.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $12.00 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Official Alibaba API | Median of 6 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 500,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 500,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | grok-4.7 | qwen3.7-max | — |
| API providers | 17 | 26 (best) | 6 |
| Released | Sep 21, 2026 | May 21, 2026 | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2026 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4.7$32.00
- Qwen3.7 Max$40.00
- Qwen3.8 Max 0902$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.7, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.8 Max 0902 63/100, Grok 4.7 61/100, Qwen3.7 Max 55/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.7 Max for raw capability and Grok 4.7 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because Grok 4.7 has no Capabilities Index score yet.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?
Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Qwen3.8 Max 0902 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers); Qwen3.7 Max costs $2.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Grok 4.7 versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (1× as much) and $3.75 for Qwen3.7 Max (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified): Qwen3.7 Max 76.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 76.3% and Grok 4.7 74.9%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.7 92.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 92.3%, Qwen3.7 Max 90.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3.8 Max 0902 65.6%, Qwen3.7 Max 64.6%, Grok 4.7 53.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.8 Max 0902 100%, Grok 4.7 98.1%, Qwen3.7 Max 95.6%; SimpleQA Verified — Grok 4.7 56.0%, Qwen3.7 Max 55.8%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 47.3%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.7 Max leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 have the largest context windows (1,000,000 and 1,000,000 tokens), against 500,000 for Grok 4.7. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.7 up to 500,000, Qwen3.7 Max up to 65,536, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.7 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.7 Max accepts text; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Grok 4.7, Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.7 is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 came out Sep 2, 2026; Qwen3.7 Max came out May 21, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.7 May 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
