Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.5 Flash 67, Qwen3.8 Max 65, Grok 4.7 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.
xAIGrok 4.7
61/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context500K
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
67/100- ECI154.5
- Price$1.50 / $9.00
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max
65/100- ECI156.6
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 3.5 Flash 67/100, Qwen3.8 Max 65/100, Grok 4.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 3.5 Flash for raw capability and Grok 4.7 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because Grok 4.7 has no Capabilities Index score yet.
- CapabilityGemini 3.5 FlashShared benchmarks: Gemini 3.5 Flash 79.3% · Qwen3.8 Max 78.2% · Grok 4.7 74.9%
- Lowest priceGrok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 MaxGrok 4.7 $3.00 · Qwen3.8 Max $3.00 · Gemini 3.5 Flash $3.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.5 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash 1,048,576 · Qwen3.8 Max 1,000,000 · Grok 4.7 500,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.5 FlashGrok 4.7: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemini 3.5 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Qwen3.8 Max: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.7 | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityShared benchmarks | 50% | 75 | 79 | 78 |
| Price | 25% | 27 | 25 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 100 | 90 |
| Context window | 10% | 48 | 61 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 61/100 | 67/100 | 65/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4.7xAI | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle | Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 154.5 | 156.6 (best) |
| ECI rank | — | #33 of 148 | #20 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 92.7% | 92.8% (best) | 92.7% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 53.0% | 62.8% | 74.7% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 98.1% | 95.6% | 99.4% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 79.3% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 56.0% | 66.2% (best) | 45.8% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.00 | $1.50 (best) | $2.00 |
| Output | $6.00 (best) | $9.00 | $6.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.50 | $0.15 (best) | $0.25 |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 (best) | $3.38 | $3.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $12.00 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Official Google API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 500,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 500,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | Yeslow · medium · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | grok-4.7 | gemini-3.5-flash | qwen3.8-max |
| API providers | 17 | 32 (best) | 25 |
| Released | Sep 21, 2026 | May 19, 2026 | Aug 3, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2026 | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4.7$32.00
- Gemini 3.5 Flash$33.00
- Qwen3.8 Max$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.7, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 3.5 Flash 67/100, Qwen3.8 Max 65/100, Grok 4.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 3.5 Flash for raw capability and Grok 4.7 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because Grok 4.7 has no Capabilities Index score yet.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max?
Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Qwen3.8 Max costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 input / $9.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Grok 4.7 versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (1× as much) and $3.38 for Gemini 3.5 Flash (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified): Gemini 3.5 Flash 79.3%, Qwen3.8 Max 78.2% and Grok 4.7 74.9%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.5 Flash 92.8%, Grok 4.7 92.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 92.7%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3.8 Max 74.7%, Gemini 3.5 Flash 62.8%, Grok 4.7 53.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.8 Max 99.4%, Grok 4.7 98.1%, Gemini 3.5 Flash 95.6%; SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.5 Flash 66.2%, Grok 4.7 56.0%, Qwen3.8 Max 45.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 3.5 Flash leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Max and 500,000 for Grok 4.7. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.7 up to 500,000, Gemini 3.5 Flash up to 65,536, Qwen3.8 Max up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.7 accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Gemini 3.5 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Grok 4.7, Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.7 is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max came out Aug 3, 2026; Gemini 3.5 Flash came out May 19, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.7 May 2026, Gemini 3.5 Flash Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
