Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Gemini 3 Pro Preview comes out ahead, 67 to 64 on our weighted score, though Grok 4.5 is 33% cheaper per token.
xAI
Grok 4.5
64/100- ECI154.0
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context500K
- Our pick
Google
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
67/100- ECI153.0
- Price$2.00 / $12.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview is our pick
Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Grok 4.5 (64). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Grok 4.5 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGrok 4.5Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.5 154.0 · Gemini 3 Pro Preview 153.0
- Lowest priceGrok 4.5Grok 4.5 $3.00 · Gemini 3 Pro Preview $4.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Grok 4.5 500,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3 Pro PreviewGrok 4.5: Text, Images · Gemini 3 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.5 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 83 | 82 |
| Price | 25% | 27 | 19 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 100 |
| Context window | 10% | 48 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 64/100 | 67/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 154.0 (best) | 153.0 |
| ECI rank | #36 of 148 (best) | #39 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 93.4% (best) | 92.6% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 57.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 97.8% (best) | 91.4% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 72.9% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 48.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $6.00 (best) | $12.00 |
| Cached input | $0.30 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 (best) | $4.50 |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $12.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 500,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 500,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | grok-4.5 | — |
| API providers | 24 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Jul 8, 2026 | Nov 18, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Grok 4.5$32.00
Gemini 3 Pro Preview$44.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.5 or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Grok 4.5 (64). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Grok 4.5 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?
Grok 4.5 is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Gemini 3 Pro Preview costs $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Grok 4.5 versus $4.50 for Gemini 3 Pro Preview (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Grok 4.5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.5 154.0 (#36 of 148) and Gemini 3 Pro Preview 153.0 (#39 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (152.3–156.1 vs 150.6–155.2), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.5 93.4%, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 92.6%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Grok 4.5 97.8%, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 91.4%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 500,000 for Grok 4.5. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.5 up to 500,000, Gemini 3 Pro Preview up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.5 accepts text and images; Gemini 3 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Grok 4.5 and Gemini 3 Pro Preview are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.5 is the newest, released Jul 8, 2026. Gemini 3 Pro Preview came out Nov 18, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3 Pro Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.