Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.8 Preview
Grok 4.3 comes out ahead, 72 to 66 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
xAIGrok 4.3
72/100- ECI149.2
- Price$1.25 / $2.50
- Context1M
Moonshot AIKimi K2.8 Preview
66/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Grok 4.3 is our pick
Grok 4.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Kimi K2.8 Preview (66). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 $1.56 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Kimi K2.8 Preview unpriced
- Longest contextKimi K2.8 PreviewKimi K2.8 Preview 1,048,576 · Grok 4.3 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGrok 4.3: Text, Images, PDFs · Kimi K2.8 Preview: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.8 Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 40% | 60 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 72/100 | 66/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4.3xAI | Kimi K2.8 PreviewMoonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 149.2 | — |
| ECI rank | #55 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 42.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 93.3% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 33.2% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25 | — |
| Output | $2.50 | — |
| Cached input | $0.20 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.56 | — |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $5.00 | — |
| Price source | Official xAI API | — |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 30,000 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | grok-4.3 | — |
| API providers | 27 | — |
| Released | Apr 17, 2026 | Sep 11, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4.3$17.50
- Kimi K2.8 Preview—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.8 Preview?
Grok 4.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Kimi K2.8 Preview (66). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.8 Preview?
Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.3 versus . Kimi K2.8 Preview has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Grok 4.3 has an ECI of 149.2 and Kimi K2.8 Preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.8 Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K2.8 Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.3. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.3 up to 30,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.3 accepts text, images and PDFs; Kimi K2.8 Preview accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.8 Preview are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Kimi K2.8 Preview is the newest, released Sep 11, 2026. Grok 4.3 came out Apr 17, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GPT-5.4 miniThree-way comparison
- Grok 4.3 vs GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI · ECI 148.8
- Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.0
- Grok 4.3 vs GLM-5.1Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 149.9
- Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.6 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 149.2
- Kimi K2.8 Preview vs North Small TranslateCohere
- Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Mercury 2.5Inception
