Granite-4.0-H-Micro vs Nova Micro vs Voxtral Mini 3B 2507
Granite-4.0-H-Micro comes out ahead, 65 to 62 and 61 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
IBM
Granite-4.0-H-Micro
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.017 / $0.112
- Context131K
Amazon
Nova Micro
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.035 / $0.14
- Context128K
Mistral AI
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507
61/100- ECI—
- Price$0.04 / $0.04
- Context33K
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is our pick
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Nova Micro (62) and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (61). The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceVoxtral Mini 3B 2507Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 $0.04 · Granite-4.0-H-Micro $0.041 · Nova Micro $0.061 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGranite-4.0-H-MicroGranite-4.0-H-Micro 131,072 · Nova Micro 128,000 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVoxtral Mini 3B 2507Granite-4.0-H-Micro: Text · Nova Micro: Text · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507: Text, Audio
- Self-hostingGranite-4.0-H-Micro and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Granite-4.0-H-Micro | Nova Micro | Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 62/100 | 61/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.017 (best) | $0.035 | $0.04 |
| Output | $0.112 | $0.14 | $0.04 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.0088 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.041 | $0.061 | $0.04 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 10,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | — | amazon.nova-micro-v1:0 | — |
| API providers | 1 | 3 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Oct 2, 2025 | Dec 3, 2024 | Jul 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Oct 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Granite-4.0-H-Micro$0.394
Nova Micro$0.63
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507$0.48
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Granite-4.0-H-Micro, Nova Micro or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Nova Micro (62) and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (61). The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Granite-4.0-H-Micro, Nova Micro or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 is cheaper at $0.04 input / $0.04 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Granite-4.0-H-Micro costs $0.017 input / $0.112 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Nova Micro costs $0.035 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.04 per million tokens for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 versus $0.041 for Granite-4.0-H-Micro (1× as much) and $0.061 for Nova Micro (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Granite-4.0-H-Micro has not been scored yet, Nova Micro has not been scored yet and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Granite-4.0-H-Micro, Nova Micro and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Nova Micro and 32,768 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507. Maximum output per response: Granite-4.0-H-Micro up to 131,072, Nova Micro up to 10,000, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro accepts text; Nova Micro accepts text; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 accepts text and audio. Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Nova Micro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is the newest, released Oct 2, 2025. Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025; Nova Micro came out Dec 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Nova Micro Oct 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.