ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT OSS 120B 57, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 52). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT OSS 120B

    Released Aug 5, 2025

    57/100
    • ECI140.0
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context131K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507

    Released Jul 21, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI138.9
    • Price$0.15 / $0.75
    • Context262K
  3. Mistral AI

    Voxtral Small 24B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT OSS 120B 57/100, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55/100, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Voxtral Small 24B 2507 on price and Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.15 · GPT OSS 120B $0.263 · Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 262,144 · GPT OSS 120B 131,072 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsVoxtral Small 24B 2507GPT OSS 120B: Text · Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT OSS 120BQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Price50%777589
Inputs & features30%452535
Context window20%24370
Overall100%57/10052/10055/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT OSS 120BOpenAIQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Alibaba (Qwen)Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)140.0 (best)138.9—
ECI rank#99 of 148 (best)#105 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions75.8%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics88.9%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15$0.15$0.10 (best)
Output$0.60$0.75$0.30 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.263$0.30$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 36 providersMedian of 11 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens (best)16,384 tokens32,768 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache 2.0OpenApache 2.0
API model ID——voxtral-small-latest
API providers39 (best)117
ReleasedAug 5, 2025Jul 21, 2025Jul 15, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT OSS 120B$2.70
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507$3.00
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT OSS 120B, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT OSS 120B 57/100, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55/100, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Voxtral Small 24B 2507 on price and Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT OSS 120B, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). GPT OSS 120B costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (median across 36 API providers); Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.15 input / $0.75 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 versus $0.263 for GPT OSS 120B (1.8× as much) and $0.30 for Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT OSS 120B has an ECI of 140.0, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 has an ECI of 138.9 and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT OSS 120B, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for GPT OSS 120B and 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: GPT OSS 120B up to 32,768, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 up to 16,384, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT OSS 120B accepts text; Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

GPT OSS 120B is the newest, released Aug 5, 2025. Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 came out Jul 21, 2025; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.