GPT-5 Mini vs Mistral Medium 3
GPT-5 Mini comes out ahead, 65 to 53 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
OpenAI
GPT-5 Mini
65/100- ECI145.5
- Price$0.25 / $2.00
- Context400K
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3
53/100- ECI134.1
- Price$0.40 / $2.00
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GPT-5 Mini is our pick
GPT-5 Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-5 MiniCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5 Mini 145.5 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1
- Lowest priceGPT-5 MiniGPT-5 Mini $0.688 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5 MiniGPT-5 Mini 400,000 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGPT-5 Mini: Text, Images · Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5 Mini | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 72 | 58 |
| Price | 25% | 58 | 54 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 50 |
| Context window | 10% | 44 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 53/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 145.5 (best) | 134.1 |
| ECI rank | #77 of 148 (best) | #117 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 75.0% (best) | 59.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 46.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 86.7% (best) | 32.2% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 64.7% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 21.6% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.25 (best) | $0.40 |
| Output | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Cached input | $0.025 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.688 (best) | $0.80 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-5-mini | mistral-medium-2505 |
| API providers | 23 (best) | 5 |
| Released | Aug 7, 2025 | May 7, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 30, 2024 | May 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-5 Mini$6.50
Mistral Medium 3$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5 Mini or Mistral Medium 3?
GPT-5 Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or Mistral Medium 3?
GPT-5 Mini is cheaper at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.688 per million tokens for GPT-5 Mini versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-5 Mini scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5 Mini 145.5 (#77 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (143.6–147.0 vs 130.5–135.6), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-5 Mini 75.0%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-5 Mini 86.7%, Mistral Medium 3 32.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Medium 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5 Mini leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5 Mini has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3. Maximum output per response: GPT-5 Mini up to 128,000, Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5 Mini accepts text and images; Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5 Mini and Mistral Medium 3 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
GPT-5 Mini is the newest, released Aug 7, 2025. Mistral Medium 3 came out May 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5 Mini May 30, 2024, Mistral Medium 3 May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.