GPT-5-Codex vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus comes out ahead, 59 to 42 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
OpenAIGPT-5-Codex
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context400K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 Plus
59/100- ECI146.8
- Price$0.40 / $2.40
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.5 Plus is our pick
Qwen3.5 Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against GPT-5-Codex (42). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.5 Plus $0.90 · GPT-5-Codex $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.5 PlusQwen3.5 Plus 1,000,000 · GPT-5-Codex 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.5 PlusGPT-5-Codex: Text, Images · Qwen3.5 Plus: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 24 | 52 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 44 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 59/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-5-CodexOpenAI | Qwen3.5 PlusAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 146.8 |
| ECI rank | — | #65 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 84.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 86.7% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 25.4% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25 | $0.40 (best) |
| Output | $10.00 | $2.40 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.44 | $0.90 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | qwen3.5-plus |
| API providers | 3 | 10 (best) |
| Released | Sep 15, 2025 | Feb 16, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 30, 2024 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-5-Codex$32.50
- Qwen3.5 Plus$8.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5-Codex or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against GPT-5-Codex (42). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5-Codex or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GPT-5-Codex costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 Plus versus $3.44 for GPT-5-Codex (3.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GPT-5-Codex has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 Plus has an ECI of 146.8.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5-Codex and Qwen3.5 Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 Plus has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5-Codex. Maximum output per response: GPT-5-Codex up to 128,000, Qwen3.5 Plus up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5-Codex accepts text and images; Qwen3.5 Plus accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.5 Plus handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5-Codex and Qwen3.5 Plus are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the newest, released Feb 16, 2026. GPT-5-Codex came out Sep 15, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5-Codex Sep 30, 2024, Qwen3.5 Plus Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewThree-way comparison
- GPT-5-Codex vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogle
- GPT-5-Codex vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- GPT-5-Codex vs Command A TranslateCohere
- GPT-5-Codex vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Alibaba (Qwen)
- Qwen3.5 Plus vs MiniMax-M2.5MiniMax · ECI 146.7
- Qwen3.5 Plus vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA · ECI 146.2
