GPT-5-Codex vs GPT-5.4 nano
GPT-5.4 nano comes out ahead, 63 to 42 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
OpenAIGPT-5-Codex
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context400K
- Our pickOpenAI
GPT-5.4 nano
63/100- ECI145.8
- Price$0.20 / $1.25
- Context400K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GPT-5.4 nano is our pick
GPT-5.4 nano is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against GPT-5-Codex (42). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.4 nano $0.463 · GPT-5-Codex $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-5-Codex 400,000 · GPT-5.4 nano 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGPT-5-Codex: Text, Images · GPT-5.4 nano: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5-Codex | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 24 | 66 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 44 | 44 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 63/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-5-CodexOpenAI | GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 145.8 |
| ECI rank | — | #75 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 78.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 44.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 87.8% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 11.7% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25 | $0.20 (best) |
| Output | $10.00 | $1.25 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.02 |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.44 | $0.463 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens | 400,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | gpt-5.4-nano |
| API providers | 3 | 26 (best) |
| Released | Sep 15, 2025 | Mar 17, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 30, 2024 | Aug 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-5-Codex$32.50
- GPT-5.4 nano$4.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5-Codex or GPT-5.4 nano?
GPT-5.4 nano is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against GPT-5-Codex (42). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5-Codex or GPT-5.4 nano?
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). GPT-5-Codex costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.463 per million tokens for GPT-5.4 nano versus $3.44 for GPT-5-Codex (7.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GPT-5-Codex has not been scored yet and GPT-5.4 nano has an ECI of 145.8.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5-Codex and GPT-5.4 nano yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5-Codex and GPT-5.4 nano share the same 400,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: GPT-5-Codex up to 128,000, GPT-5.4 nano up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5-Codex accepts text and images; GPT-5.4 nano accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5-Codex and GPT-5.4 nano are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.4 nano is the newest, released Mar 17, 2026. GPT-5-Codex came out Sep 15, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5-Codex Sep 30, 2024, GPT-5.4 nano Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewThree-way comparison
- GPT-5-Codex vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogle
- GPT-5-Codex vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- GPT-5-Codex vs Command A TranslateCohere
- GPT-5-Codex vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Alibaba (Qwen)
- GPT-5.4 nano vs MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax · ECI 145.9
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 143.9
