ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5 Chat vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Jamba Large

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 35, GPT-5 Chat 34, Jamba Large 30). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5 Chat

    Released Aug 7, 2025

    34/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context400K
  2. Google

    Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview

    Released Oct 7, 2025

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context128K
  3. AI21 Labs

    Jamba Large

    Released Jul 1, 2025

    30/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context256K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 35/100, GPT-5 Chat 34/100, Jamba Large 30/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5 Chat on price and GPT-5 Chat for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGPT-5 Chat and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGPT-5 Chat $3.44 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 · Jamba Large $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5 ChatGPT-5 Chat 400,000 · Jamba Large 256,000 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5 Chat and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGPT-5 Chat: Text, Images · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images · Jamba Large: Text
  • Self-hostingJamba LargePublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5 ChatGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewJamba Large
Price50%242424
Inputs & features30%456035
Context window20%442436
Overall100%34/10035/10030/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5 Chat vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Jamba Large specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5 ChatOpenAIGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogleJamba LargeAI21 Labs
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25 (best)$1.25 (best)$2.00
Output$10.00$10.00$8.00 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.44 (best)$3.44 (best)$3.50
Long-context rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $15.00Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial Google APIOfficial AI21 Labs API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens (best)64,000 tokens4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model ID—gemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025jamba-large
API providers2 (best)2 (best)1
ReleasedAug 7, 2025Oct 7, 2025Jul 1, 2025
Knowledge cutoffSep 30, 2024Jan 2025Aug 22, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5 Chat$32.50
  • Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
  • Jamba Large$36.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5 Chat, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Jamba Large?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 35/100, GPT-5 Chat 34/100, Jamba Large 30/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5 Chat on price and GPT-5 Chat for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Chat, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Jamba Large?

GPT-5 Chat is cheaper at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price); Jamba Large costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.44 per million tokens for GPT-5 Chat versus $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (1× as much) and $3.50 for Jamba Large (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5 Chat has not been scored yet, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet and Jamba Large has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5 Chat, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Jamba Large yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that GPT-5 Chat does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5 Chat has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 256,000 for Jamba Large and 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview. Maximum output per response: GPT-5 Chat up to 128,000, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000, Jamba Large up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5 Chat accepts text and images; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images; Jamba Large accepts text. GPT-5 Chat handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Jamba Large publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5 Chat and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the newest, released Oct 7, 2025. GPT-5 Chat came out Aug 7, 2025; Jamba Large came out Jul 1, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5 Chat Sep 30, 2024, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025, Jamba Large Aug 22, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.