GPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.7
Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-5.6 Terra 63, Grok 4.7 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
63/100- ECI159.8
- Price$2.00 / $12.00
- Context1.05M
xAIGrok 4.7
61/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context500K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-5.6 Terra 63/100, Grok 4.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.6 Terra for raw capability and Grok 4.7 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because Grok 4.7 has no Capabilities Index score yet.
- CapabilityGPT-5.6 TerraShared benchmarks: GPT-5.6 Terra 80.5% · Grok 4.7 74.9%
- Lowest priceGrok 4.7Grok 4.7 $3.00 · GPT-5.6 Terra $4.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Terra 1,050,000 · Grok 4.7 500,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGPT-5.6 Terra: Text, Images, PDFs · Grok 4.7: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.6 Terra | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityShared benchmarks | 50% | 81 | 75 |
| Price | 25% | 19 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 48 |
| Overall | 100% | 63/100 | 61/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI | Grok 4.7xAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 159.8 | — |
| ECI rank | #9 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 93.3% (best) | 92.7% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 86.0% (best) | 53.0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 99.7% (best) | 98.1% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 43.2% | 56.0% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $12.00 | $6.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.20 (best) | $0.50 |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.50 | $3.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 272K: $4.00 / $18.00 | Over 200K: $4.00 / $12.00 |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official xAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens (best) | 500,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 500,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-5.6-terra | grok-4.7 |
| API providers | 38 (best) | 17 |
| Released | Jul 9, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 16, 2026 | May 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-5.6 Terra$44.00
- Grok 4.7$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.6 Terra or Grok 4.7?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-5.6 Terra 63/100, Grok 4.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.6 Terra for raw capability and Grok 4.7 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because Grok 4.7 has no Capabilities Index score yet.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Grok 4.7 versus $4.50 for GPT-5.6 Terra (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified): GPT-5.6 Terra 80.5% and Grok 4.7 74.9%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.6 Terra 93.3%, Grok 4.7 92.7%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.6 Terra 86.0%, Grok 4.7 53.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-5.6 Terra 99.7%, Grok 4.7 98.1%; SimpleQA Verified — Grok 4.7 56.0%, GPT-5.6 Terra 43.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.6 Terra and Grok 4.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.6 Terra leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 500,000 for Grok 4.7. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.6 Terra up to 128,000, Grok 4.7 up to 500,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.6 Terra accepts text, images and PDFs; Grok 4.7 accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5.6 Terra and Grok 4.7 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.7 is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. GPT-5.6 Terra came out Jul 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.6 Terra Feb 16, 2026, Grok 4.7 May 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Kimi K3Three-way comparison
- GPT-5.6 Terra vs Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ECI 157.6
- GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · ECI 156.3
- GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 156.6
- Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 156.6
- Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 154.5
- Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolOpenAI
