ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.5 Instant vs Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4

Mistral Medium 3.5 comes out ahead, 55 to 51 and 51 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.5 Instant

    Released May 5, 2026

    51/100
    • ECI142.5
    • Price$5.00 / $30.00
    • Context400K
  2. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3.5

    Released Apr 29, 2026

    55/100
    • ECI141.4
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
  3. Anthropic

    Claude Sonnet 4

    Released May 22, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI141.7
    • Price$3.00 / $15.00
    • Context200K
01 — Verdict

Mistral Medium 3.5 is our pick

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Claude Sonnet 4 (51) and GPT-5.5 Instant (51). It leads on price. GPT-5.5 Instant wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.5 InstantCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.5 Instant 142.5 · Claude Sonnet 4 141.7 · Mistral Medium 3.5 141.4
  • Lowest priceMistral Medium 3.5Mistral Medium 3.5 $3.00 · Claude Sonnet 4 $6.00 · GPT-5.5 Instant $11.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.5 InstantGPT-5.5 Instant 400,000 · Mistral Medium 3.5 262,144 · Claude Sonnet 4 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.5 Instant and Claude Sonnet 4GPT-5.5 Instant: Text, Images, PDFs · Mistral Medium 3.5: Text, Images · Claude Sonnet 4: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingMistral Medium 3.5Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.5 InstantMistral Medium 3.5Claude Sonnet 4
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%696768
Price25%02713
Inputs & features15%807070
Context window10%443732
Overall100%51/10055/10051/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.5 Instant vs Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.5 InstantOpenAIMistral Medium 3.5Mistral AIClaude Sonnet 4Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)142.5 (best)141.4141.7
ECI rank#89 of 148 (best)#95 of 148#94 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions82.5% (best)—79.2%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics26.3%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics68.1%—71.1% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$5.00$1.50 (best)$3.00
Output$30.00$7.50 (best)$15.00
Cached input—$0.15—
Blended (3:1)$11.25$3.00 (best)$6.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 9 providers
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYeshighYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model ID—mistral-medium-2604—
API providers312 (best)9
ReleasedMay 5, 2026Apr 29, 2026May 22, 2025
Knowledge cutoffDec 1, 2025—Mar 31, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.5 Instant$110.00
  • Mistral Medium 3.5$30.00
  • Claude Sonnet 4$60.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.5 Instant, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Claude Sonnet 4?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Claude Sonnet 4 (51) and GPT-5.5 Instant (51). It leads on price. GPT-5.5 Instant wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Instant, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Claude Sonnet 4?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper at $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Claude Sonnet 4 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers); GPT-5.5 Instant costs $5.00 input / $30.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Mistral Medium 3.5 versus $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 4 (2× as much) and $11.25 for GPT-5.5 Instant (3.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.5 Instant 142.5 (#89 of 148), Claude Sonnet 4 141.7 (#94 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3.5 141.4 (#95 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (140.0–145.3 vs 139.2–142.9), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.5 Instant, Mistral Medium 3.5 and Claude Sonnet 4 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.5 Instant leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5 Instant has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 200,000 for Claude Sonnet 4. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.5 Instant up to 128,000, Mistral Medium 3.5 up to 262,144, Claude Sonnet 4 up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.5 Instant accepts text, images and PDFs; Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts text and images; Claude Sonnet 4 accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-5.5 Instant handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mistral Medium 3.5 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.5 Instant and Claude Sonnet 4 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-5.5 Instant is the newest, released May 5, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.5 came out Apr 29, 2026; Claude Sonnet 4 came out May 22, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.5 Instant Dec 1, 2025, Claude Sonnet 4 Mar 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.