ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max comes out ahead, 69 to 65 and 65 on our weighted score.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.4

    Released Mar 5, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI156.9
    • Price$2.50 / $15.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. xAI

    Grok 4.6

    Released Aug 12, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI156.6
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context500K
  3. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max

    Released Aug 3, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI156.6
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Qwen3.8 Max is our pick

Qwen3.8 Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Grok 4.6 (65) and GPT-5.4 (65). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.4Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.4 156.9 · Grok 4.6 156.6 · Qwen3.8 Max 156.6
  • Lowest priceGrok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 MaxGrok 4.6 $3.00 · Qwen3.8 Max $3.00 · GPT-5.4 $5.63 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.4GPT-5.4 1,050,000 · Qwen3.8 Max 1,000,000 · Grok 4.6 500,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 MaxGPT-5.4: Text, Images, PDFs · Grok 4.6: Text, Images · Qwen3.8 Max: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.4Grok 4.6Qwen3.8 Max
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%878686
Price25%142727
Inputs & features15%807090
Context window10%614860
Overall100%65/10065/10069/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.4OpenAIGrok 4.6xAIQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.9 (best)156.6156.6
ECI rank#16 of 148 (best)#19 of 148#20 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions93.3%94.0% (best)92.7%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics78.6% (best)66.0%74.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics97.8%99.2%99.4% (best)
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues76.9%——
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions45.1%49.3% (best)45.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$2.50$2.00 (best)$2.00 (best)
Output$15.00$6.00 (best)$6.00 (best)
Cached input$0.25 (best)$0.50$0.25 (best)
Blended (3:1)$5.63$3.00 (best)$3.00 (best)
Long-context rateOver 272K: $5.00 / $22.50Over 200K: $4.00 / $12.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial xAI APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window1,050,000 tokens (best)500,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens500,000 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · xhigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgpt-5.4grok-4.6qwen3.8-max
API providers36 (best)2925
ReleasedMar 5, 2026Aug 12, 2026Aug 3, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025Feb 1, 2026—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.4$55.00
  • Grok 4.6$32.00
  • Qwen3.8 Max$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.4, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Grok 4.6 (65) and GPT-5.4 (65). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.8 Max?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Qwen3.8 Max costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Grok 4.6 versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (1× as much) and $5.63 for GPT-5.4 (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.4 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.4 156.9 (#16 of 148), Grok 4.6 156.6 (#19 of 148) and Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 (#20 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (154.9–159.1 vs 154.7–158.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.6 94.0%, GPT-5.4 93.3%, Qwen3.8 Max 92.7%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.4 78.6%, Qwen3.8 Max 74.7%, Grok 4.6 66.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.8 Max 99.4%, Grok 4.6 99.2%, GPT-5.4 97.8%; SimpleQA Verified — Grok 4.6 49.3%, Qwen3.8 Max 45.8%, GPT-5.4 45.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.4 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Max and 500,000 for Grok 4.6. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.4 up to 128,000, Grok 4.6 up to 500,000, Qwen3.8 Max up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.4 accepts text, images and PDFs; Grok 4.6 accepts text and images; Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Qwen3.8 Max handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. GPT-5.4, Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.8 Max are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Grok 4.6 is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max came out Aug 3, 2026; GPT-5.4 came out Mar 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 Aug 31, 2025, Grok 4.6 Feb 1, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.