ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.6 27B vs MiniMax-M2.7

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-5.4 nano 68, Qwen3.6 27B 65, MiniMax-M2.7 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.4 nano

    Released Mar 17, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI145.8
    • Price$0.20 / $1.25
    • Context400K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.6 27B

    Released Apr 22, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI146.5
    • Price$0.60 / $3.60
    • Context262K
  3. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2.7

    Released Mar 18, 2026

    61/100
    • ECI145.9
    • Price$0.30 / $1.20
    • Context205K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (GPT-5.4 nano 68/100, Qwen3.6 27B 65/100, MiniMax-M2.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.6 27B for raw capability, GPT-5.4 nano on price and GPT-5.4 nano for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen3.6 27BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.6 27B 146.5 · MiniMax-M2.7 145.9 · GPT-5.4 nano 145.8
  • Lowest priceGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.4 nano $0.463 · MiniMax-M2.7 $0.525 · Qwen3.6 27B $1.35 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.4 nano 400,000 · Qwen3.6 27B 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.7 204,800 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.6 27BGPT-5.4 nano: Text, Images · Qwen3.6 27B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · MiniMax-M2.7: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3.6 27B and MiniMax-M2.7Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.4 nanoQwen3.6 27BMiniMax-M2.7
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%737473
Price25%664463
Inputs & features15%709035
Context window10%443732
Overall100%68/10065/10061/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.6 27B vs MiniMax-M2.7 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIQwen3.6 27BAlibaba (Qwen)MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)145.8146.5 (best)145.9
ECI rank#75 of 148#68 of 148 (best)#73 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions78.5%85.9% (best)—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics44.9% (best)35.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics87.8%91.1% (best)—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions11.7%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20 (best)$0.60$0.30
Output$1.25$3.60$1.20 (best)
Cached input$0.02 (best)—$0.06
Blended (3:1)$0.463 (best)$1.35$0.525
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens204,800 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDgpt-5.4-nanoqwen3.6-27bMiniMax-M2.7
API providers262729 (best)
ReleasedMar 17, 2026Apr 22, 2026Mar 18, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.4 nano$4.50
  • Qwen3.6 27B$13.20
  • MiniMax-M2.7$5.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.4 nano, Qwen3.6 27B or MiniMax-M2.7?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (GPT-5.4 nano 68/100, Qwen3.6 27B 65/100, MiniMax-M2.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.6 27B for raw capability, GPT-5.4 nano on price and GPT-5.4 nano for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 nano, Qwen3.6 27B or MiniMax-M2.7?

GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). MiniMax-M2.7 costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price); Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.60 input / $3.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.463 per million tokens for GPT-5.4 nano versus $0.525 for MiniMax-M2.7 (1.1× as much) and $1.35 for Qwen3.6 27B (2.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.6 27B 146.5 (#68 of 148), MiniMax-M2.7 145.9 (#73 of 148) and GPT-5.4 nano 145.8 (#75 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (144.2–147.9 vs 138.2–148.0), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.4 nano, Qwen3.6 27B and MiniMax-M2.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.6 27B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 nano has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.6 27B and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.4 nano up to 128,000, Qwen3.6 27B up to 65,536, MiniMax-M2.7 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.4 nano accepts text and images; Qwen3.6 27B accepts text, images, audio and video; MiniMax-M2.7 accepts text. Qwen3.6 27B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3.6 27B and MiniMax-M2.7 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.4 nano is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.6 27B is the newest, released Apr 22, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7 came out Mar 18, 2026; GPT-5.4 nano came out Mar 17, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 nano Aug 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.