ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.4 nano vs MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral Small 3.2

GPT-5.4 nano comes out ahead, 68 to 61 and 60 on our weighted score, though Mistral Small 3.2 is 3.1× cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-5.4 nano

    Released Mar 17, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI145.8
    • Price$0.20 / $1.25
    • Context400K
  2. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2.7

    Released Mar 18, 2026

    61/100
    • ECI145.9
    • Price$0.30 / $1.20
    • Context205K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 3.2

    Released Jun 20, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI131.7
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

GPT-5.4 nano is our pick

GPT-5.4 nano is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against MiniMax-M2.7 (61) and Mistral Small 3.2 (60). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Mistral Small 3.2 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMiniMax-M2.7Capabilities Index (ECI): MiniMax-M2.7 145.9 · GPT-5.4 nano 145.8 · Mistral Small 3.2 131.7
  • Lowest priceMistral Small 3.2Mistral Small 3.2 $0.15 · GPT-5.4 nano $0.463 · MiniMax-M2.7 $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.4 nano 400,000 · MiniMax-M2.7 204,800 · Mistral Small 3.2 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.4 nano and Mistral Small 3.2GPT-5.4 nano: Text, Images · MiniMax-M2.7: Text · Mistral Small 3.2: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.7 and Mistral Small 3.2Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.4 nanoMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small 3.2
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%737355
Price25%666389
Inputs & features15%703550
Context window10%443224
Overall100%68/10061/10060/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.4 nano vs MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral Small 3.2 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIMiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxMistral Small 3.2Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)145.8145.9 (best)131.7
ECI rank#75 of 148#73 of 148 (best)#123 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions78.5% (best)—49.1%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics44.9%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics87.8% (best)—30.3%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions11.7%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20$0.30$0.10 (best)
Output$1.25$1.20$0.30 (best)
Cached input$0.02 (best)$0.06—
Blended (3:1)$0.463$0.525$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens (best)204,800 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDgpt-5.4-nanoMiniMax-M2.7mistral-small-2506
API providers2629 (best)6
ReleasedMar 17, 2026Mar 18, 2026Jun 20, 2025
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025—Mar 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.4 nano$4.50
  • MiniMax-M2.7$5.40
  • Mistral Small 3.2$1.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.4 nano, MiniMax-M2.7 or Mistral Small 3.2?

GPT-5.4 nano is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against MiniMax-M2.7 (61) and Mistral Small 3.2 (60). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Mistral Small 3.2 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 nano, MiniMax-M2.7 or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). GPT-5.4 nano costs $0.20 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); MiniMax-M2.7 costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Mistral Small 3.2 versus $0.463 for GPT-5.4 nano (3.1× as much) and $0.525 for MiniMax-M2.7 (3.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): MiniMax-M2.7 145.9 (#73 of 148), GPT-5.4 nano 145.8 (#75 of 148) and Mistral Small 3.2 131.7 (#123 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (138.2–148.0 vs 143.2–147.7), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.4 nano, MiniMax-M2.7 and Mistral Small 3.2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, MiniMax-M2.7 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 nano has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7 and 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.2. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.4 nano up to 128,000, MiniMax-M2.7 up to 131,072, Mistral Small 3.2 up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.4 nano accepts text and images; MiniMax-M2.7 accepts text; Mistral Small 3.2 accepts text and images. GPT-5.4 nano handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiniMax-M2.7 and Mistral Small 3.2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.4 nano is proprietary.

Which is newer?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the newest, released Mar 18, 2026. GPT-5.4 nano came out Mar 17, 2026; Mistral Small 3.2 came out Jun 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 nano Aug 31, 2025, Mistral Small 3.2 Mar 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.