GPT-5.4 nano vs Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemma 4 31B IT 69, GPT-5.4 nano 68, MiniMax-M2.7 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 nano
68/100- ECI145.8
- Price$0.20 / $1.25
- Context400K
Google
Gemma 4 31B IT
69/100- ECI142.8
- Price$0.14 / $0.40
- Context262K
MiniMax
MiniMax-M2.7
61/100- ECI145.9
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context205K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemma 4 31B IT 69/100, GPT-5.4 nano 68/100, MiniMax-M2.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiniMax-M2.7 for raw capability, Gemma 4 31B IT on price and GPT-5.4 nano for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityMiniMax-M2.7Capabilities Index (ECI): MiniMax-M2.7 145.9 · GPT-5.4 nano 145.8 · Gemma 4 31B IT 142.8
- Lowest priceGemma 4 31B ITGemma 4 31B IT $0.205 · GPT-5.4 nano $0.463 · MiniMax-M2.7 $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.4 nano 400,000 · Gemma 4 31B IT 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.7 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-5.4 nano and Gemma 4 31B ITGPT-5.4 nano: Text, Images · Gemma 4 31B IT: Text, Images · MiniMax-M2.7: Text
- Self-hostingGemma 4 31B IT and MiniMax-M2.7Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.4 nano | Gemma 4 31B IT | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 73 | 69 | 73 |
| Price | 25% | 66 | 83 | 63 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 44 | 37 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 69/100 | 61/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 145.8 | 142.8 | 145.9 (best) |
| ECI rank | #75 of 148 | #86 of 148 | #73 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 78.5% (best) | 75.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 44.9% | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 87.8% (best) | 73.3% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 11.7% (best) | 10.4% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.14 (best) | $0.30 |
| Output | $1.25 | $0.40 (best) | $1.20 |
| Cached input | $0.02 (best) | — | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.463 | $0.205 (best) | $0.525 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Median of 30 providers | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-5.4-nano | gemma-4-31b-it | MiniMax-M2.7 |
| API providers | 26 | 38 (best) | 29 |
| Released | Mar 17, 2026 | Apr 2, 2026 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 31, 2025 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-5.4 nano$4.50
Gemma 4 31B IT$2.20
MiniMax-M2.7$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.4 nano, Gemma 4 31B IT or MiniMax-M2.7?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemma 4 31B IT 69/100, GPT-5.4 nano 68/100, MiniMax-M2.7 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiniMax-M2.7 for raw capability, Gemma 4 31B IT on price and GPT-5.4 nano for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 nano, Gemma 4 31B IT or MiniMax-M2.7?
Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (median across 30 API providers). GPT-5.4 nano costs $0.20 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); MiniMax-M2.7 costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.205 per million tokens for Gemma 4 31B IT versus $0.463 for GPT-5.4 nano (2.3× as much) and $0.525 for MiniMax-M2.7 (2.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): MiniMax-M2.7 145.9 (#73 of 148), GPT-5.4 nano 145.8 (#75 of 148) and Gemma 4 31B IT 142.8 (#86 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (138.2–148.0 vs 143.2–147.7), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.4 nano, Gemma 4 31B IT and MiniMax-M2.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, MiniMax-M2.7 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 nano has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Gemma 4 31B IT and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.4 nano up to 128,000, Gemma 4 31B IT up to 32,768, MiniMax-M2.7 up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.4 nano accepts text and images; Gemma 4 31B IT accepts text and images; MiniMax-M2.7 accepts text. GPT-5.4 nano handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Gemma 4 31B IT and MiniMax-M2.7 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.4 nano is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemma 4 31B IT is the newest, released Apr 2, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7 came out Mar 18, 2026; GPT-5.4 nano came out Mar 17, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 nano Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.