ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.4 mini vs Kimi K2.5 vs Grok 4.3

Too close to call on our weighted score (Grok 4.3 67, Kimi K2.5 65, GPT-5.4 mini 63). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.4 mini

    Released Mar 17, 2026

    63/100
    • ECI148.8
    • Price$0.75 / $4.50
    • Context400K
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.5

    Released Jan 27, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI148.0
    • Price$0.60 / $3.00
    • Context262K
  3. xAI

    Grok 4.3

    Released Apr 17, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI149.2
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Grok 4.3 67/100, Kimi K2.5 65/100, GPT-5.4 mini 63/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok 4.3 for raw capability and Kimi K2.5 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGrok 4.3Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.3 149.2 · GPT-5.4 mini 148.8 · Kimi K2.5 148.0
  • Lowest priceKimi K2.5Kimi K2.5 $1.20 · Grok 4.3 $1.56 · GPT-5.4 mini $1.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 1,000,000 · GPT-5.4 mini 400,000 · Kimi K2.5 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsKimi K2.5 and Grok 4.3GPT-5.4 mini: Text, Images · Kimi K2.5: Text, Images, Video · Grok 4.3: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingKimi K2.5Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.4 miniKimi K2.5Grok 4.3
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%777677
Price25%394641
Inputs & features15%708080
Context window10%443760
Overall100%63/10065/10067/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.4 mini vs Kimi K2.5 vs Grok 4.3 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.4 miniOpenAIKimi K2.5Moonshot AIGrok 4.3xAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)148.8148.0149.2 (best)
ECI rank#56 of 148#58 of 148#55 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions86.9%87.6%88.8% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics51.2% (best)—42.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics88.9%92.2%93.3% (best)
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—73.8%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions29.4%34.3% (best)33.2%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.75$0.60 (best)$1.25
Output$4.50$3.00$2.50 (best)
Cached input$0.075 (best)—$0.20
Blended (3:1)$1.69$1.20 (best)$1.56
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 21 providersOfficial xAI API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)30,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYesYeslow · medium · high
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDgpt-5.4-mini—grok-4.3
API providers29 (best)2127
ReleasedMar 17, 2026Jan 27, 2026Apr 17, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025Jan 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.4 mini$16.50
  • Kimi K2.5$12.00
  • Grok 4.3$17.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.4 mini, Kimi K2.5 or Grok 4.3?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Grok 4.3 67/100, Kimi K2.5 65/100, GPT-5.4 mini 63/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok 4.3 for raw capability and Kimi K2.5 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 mini, Kimi K2.5 or Grok 4.3?

Kimi K2.5 is cheaper at $0.60 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 21 API providers). Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price); GPT-5.4 mini costs $0.75 input / $4.50 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.20 per million tokens for Kimi K2.5 versus $1.56 for Grok 4.3 (1.3× as much) and $1.69 for GPT-5.4 mini (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.3 149.2 (#55 of 148), GPT-5.4 mini 148.8 (#56 of 148) and Kimi K2.5 148.0 (#58 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (147.6–150.8 vs 147.1–150.5), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.3 88.8%, Kimi K2.5 87.6%, GPT-5.4 mini 86.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Grok 4.3 93.3%, Kimi K2.5 92.2%, GPT-5.4 mini 88.9%; SimpleQA Verified — Kimi K2.5 34.3%, Grok 4.3 33.2%, GPT-5.4 mini 29.4%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.4 mini and Grok 4.3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.4 mini and 262,144 for Kimi K2.5. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.4 mini up to 128,000, Kimi K2.5 up to 262,144, Grok 4.3 up to 30,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.4 mini accepts text and images; Kimi K2.5 accepts text, images and video; Grok 4.3 accepts text, images and PDFs. Kimi K2.5 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2.5 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.4 mini and Grok 4.3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Grok 4.3 is the newest, released Apr 17, 2026. GPT-5.4 mini came out Mar 17, 2026; Kimi K2.5 came out Jan 27, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 mini Aug 31, 2025, Kimi K2.5 Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.