GPT-5.4 mini vs Grok 4.3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Grok 4.3 comes out ahead, 67 to 63 and 62 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
OpenAIGPT-5.4 mini
63/100- ECI148.8
- Price$0.75 / $4.50
- Context400K
- Our pick
xAIGrok 4.3
67/100- ECI149.2
- Price$1.25 / $2.50
- Context1M
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6
62/100- ECI152.3
- Price$3.00 / $15.00
- Context1M
Grok 4.3 is our pick
Grok 4.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GPT-5.4 mini (63) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (62). Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4.6Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Sonnet 4.6 152.3 · Grok 4.3 149.2 · GPT-5.4 mini 148.8
- Lowest priceGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 $1.56 · GPT-5.4 mini $1.69 · Claude Sonnet 4.6 $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGrok 4.3 and Claude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4.3 1,000,000 · Claude Sonnet 4.6 1,000,000 · GPT-5.4 mini 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGrok 4.3 and Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.4 mini: Text, Images · Grok 4.3: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Sonnet 4.6: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4.3 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 77 | 77 | 81 |
| Price | 25% | 39 | 41 | 13 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 44 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 63/100 | 67/100 | 62/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI | Grok 4.3xAI | Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 148.8 | 149.2 | 152.3 (best) |
| ECI rank | #56 of 148 | #55 of 148 | #40 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 86.9% | 88.8% (best) | 87.4% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 51.2% (best) | 42.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 88.9% | 93.3% (best) | 85.8% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | — | 75.2% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 29.4% | 33.2% | 35.5% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.75 (best) | $1.25 | $3.00 |
| Output | $4.50 | $2.50 (best) | $15.00 |
| Cached input | $0.075 (best) | $0.20 | $0.30 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.69 | $1.56 (best) | $6.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $5.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official xAI API | Official Anthropic API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 30,000 tokens | 64,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yeslow · medium · high | Yeslow · medium · high · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-5.4-mini | grok-4.3 | claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| API providers | 29 | 27 | 41 (best) |
| Released | Mar 17, 2026 | Apr 17, 2026 | Feb 17, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 31, 2025 | — | Aug 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-5.4 mini$16.50
- Grok 4.3$17.50
- Claude Sonnet 4.6$60.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.3 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Grok 4.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GPT-5.4 mini (63) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (62). Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.3 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). GPT-5.4 mini costs $0.75 input / $4.50 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.3 versus $1.69 for GPT-5.4 mini (1.1× as much) and $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (3.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Sonnet 4.6 152.3 (#40 of 148), Grok 4.3 149.2 (#55 of 148) and GPT-5.4 mini 148.8 (#56 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (149.6–154.7 vs 147.6–150.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.3 88.8%, Claude Sonnet 4.6 87.4%, GPT-5.4 mini 86.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Grok 4.3 93.3%, GPT-5.4 mini 88.9%, Claude Sonnet 4.6 85.8%; SimpleQA Verified — Claude Sonnet 4.6 35.5%, Grok 4.3 33.2%, GPT-5.4 mini 29.4%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.4 mini and Grok 4.3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.3 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 have the largest context windows (1,000,000 and 1,000,000 tokens), against 400,000 for GPT-5.4 mini. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.4 mini up to 128,000, Grok 4.3 up to 30,000, Claude Sonnet 4.6 up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.4 mini accepts text and images; Grok 4.3 accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Sonnet 4.6 accepts text, images and PDFs. Grok 4.3 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.3 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.3 is the newest, released Apr 17, 2026. GPT-5.4 mini came out Mar 17, 2026; Claude Sonnet 4.6 came out Feb 17, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 mini Aug 31, 2025, Claude Sonnet 4.6 Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- GPT-5.4 mini vs GLM-5.1Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 149.9
- GPT-5.4 mini vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.0
- GPT-5.4 mini vs Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 147.6
- Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.0
- Grok 4.3 vs GLM-5.1Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 149.9
- Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.6 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 149.2
