GPT-5.4 mini vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 2.5 Pro 63, GPT-5.4 mini 63). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 mini
63/100- ECI148.8
- Price$0.75 / $4.50
- Context400K
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
63/100- ECI145.3
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemini 2.5 Pro 63/100, GPT-5.4 mini 63/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.4 mini for raw capability and Gemini 2.5 Pro for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-5.4 miniCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.4 mini 148.8 · Gemini 2.5 Pro 145.3
- Lowest priceGPT-5.4 miniGPT-5.4 mini $1.69 · Gemini 2.5 Pro $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 Pro 1,048,576 · GPT-5.4 mini 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.4 mini: Text, Images · Gemini 2.5 Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.4 mini | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 77 | 72 |
| Price | 25% | 39 | 24 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 100 |
| Context window | 10% | 44 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 63/100 | 63/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 148.8 (best) | 145.3 |
| ECI rank | #56 of 148 (best) | #78 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 86.9% (best) | 85.3% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 51.2% (best) | 24.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 88.9% (best) | 84.7% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 57.6% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 29.4% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.75 (best) | $1.25 |
| Output | $4.50 (best) | $10.00 |
| Cached input | $0.075 (best) | $0.125 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.69 (best) | $3.44 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $15.00 |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Google API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-5.4-mini | gemini-2.5-pro |
| API providers | 29 (best) | 22 |
| Released | Mar 17, 2026 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 31, 2025 | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-5.4 mini$16.50
Gemini 2.5 Pro$32.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.4 mini or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemini 2.5 Pro 63/100, GPT-5.4 mini 63/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.4 mini for raw capability and Gemini 2.5 Pro for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 mini or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper at $0.75 input / $4.50 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.69 per million tokens for GPT-5.4 mini versus $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Pro (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.4 mini 148.8 (#56 of 148) and Gemini 2.5 Pro 145.3 (#78 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (147.1–150.5 vs 143.6–146.9), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.4 mini 86.9%, Gemini 2.5 Pro 85.3%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.4 mini 51.2%, Gemini 2.5 Pro 24.6%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-5.4 mini 88.9%, Gemini 2.5 Pro 84.7%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.4 mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.4 mini leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.4 mini. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.4 mini up to 128,000, Gemini 2.5 Pro up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.4 mini accepts text and images; Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 2.5 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5.4 mini and Gemini 2.5 Pro are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.4 mini is the newest, released Mar 17, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Pro came out Jun 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 mini Aug 31, 2025, Gemini 2.5 Pro Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.