ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68, Kimi K3 65, GPT-5.3 Codex 64). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.3 Codex

    Released Feb 5, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI156.8
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context400K
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K3

    Released Jul 16, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI157.6
    • Price$3.00 / $15.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Google

    Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

    Released Feb 19, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI154.8
    • Price$2.00 / $12.00
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, Kimi K3 65/100, GPT-5.3 Codex 64/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K3 for raw capability and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityKimi K3Capabilities Index (ECI): Kimi K3 157.6 · GPT-5.3 Codex 156.8 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8
  • Lowest priceGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview $4.50 · GPT-5.3 Codex $4.81 · Kimi K3 $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextKimi K3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewKimi K3 1,048,576 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · GPT-5.3 Codex 400,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.3 Codex: Text, Images, PDFs · Kimi K3: Text, Images, Video · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingKimi K3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K3Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%878884
Price25%181319
Inputs & features15%8080100
Context window10%446161
Overall100%64/10065/10068/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.3 CodexOpenAIKimi K3Moonshot AIGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.8157.6 (best)154.8
ECI rank#18 of 148#13 of 148 (best)#31 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—93.1%94.4% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—72.2% (best)59.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—97.2% (best)95.6%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues74.8%—75.6% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—50.6%73.5% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.75 (best)$3.00$2.00
Output$14.00$15.00$12.00 (best)
Cached input$0.175 (best)$0.30$0.20
Blended (3:1)$4.81$6.00$4.50 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 200K: $4.00 / $18.00
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Moonshot AI APIOfficial Google API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYeslow · high · maxYeslow · medium · high
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDgpt-5.3-codexkimi-k3gemini-3.1-pro-preview
API providers1968 (best)26
ReleasedFeb 5, 2026Jul 16, 2026Feb 19, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025—Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.3 Codex$45.50
  • Kimi K3$60.00
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$44.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.3 Codex, Kimi K3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, Kimi K3 65/100, GPT-5.3 Codex 64/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Kimi K3 for raw capability and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex, Kimi K3 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). GPT-5.3 Codex costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Kimi K3 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview versus $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Codex (1.1× as much) and $6.00 for Kimi K3 (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Kimi K3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Kimi K3 157.6 (#13 of 148), GPT-5.3 Codex 156.8 (#18 of 148) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8 (#31 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (154.9–160.4 vs 153.5–160.8), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Kimi K3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Kimi K3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 400,000 for GPT-5.3 Codex. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.3 Codex up to 128,000, Kimi K3 up to 131,072, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.3 Codex accepts text, images and PDFs; Kimi K3 accepts text, images and video; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.3 Codex and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K3 is the newest, released Jul 16, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview came out Feb 19, 2026; GPT-5.3 Codex came out Feb 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.3 Codex Aug 31, 2025, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.